Ng (Migration)
[2018] AATA 2961
•3 July 2018
Ng (Migration) [2018] AATA 2961 (3 July 2018)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Miss Fui Min Ng
CASE NUMBER: 1813168
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2018/569131
MEMBER:M. Edgoose
DATE:3 July 2018
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne, Victoria
DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:
·cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
Statement made on 03 July 2018 at 9:09am
CATCHWORDS
Migration – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 – English language proficiency – Changes in instruments – Lack of clarity regarding requirements – Decision under review remitted
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 500.213
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
The applicant applied for the visa on 2 February 2018. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 18 April 2018.
The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of English language ability was not provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
Clause 500.213(3)(a) specifies that the Minister may, by legislative instrument, specify the requirements for the purposes of cl. 500.213(1).
IMMI18/015 is the legislative instrument which seeks to specify the English language proficiency requirements for Subclass 500 student visa applicants for the purposes of cl. 500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994.
Section 7 of IMMI18/015 states that the instrument applies to an application for a Subclass 500 visa made on or after the commencement of the instrument, 6 June 2018.
Significantly, schedule 2 to the instrument states that IMMI18/015 repeals the previous instrument, IMMI16/019, with the exception that the previous instrument will continue to apply in relation to an applicant who meets either of the following requirements:
a.The applicant completed the TOEFL-PBT test before 14 October 2017 and achieved the specified score within a certain period; or
b.The applicant completed the TOEFL-PBT test on or after 14 October 2017 but before the commencement of IMMI18/015 and achieved the specified score within a certain period.
IMMI18/015 makes no reference to applications for a Subclass 500 visa made before its commencement where an applicant did not undertake the TOEFL-PBT test or did not achieve the required score. As such, it is unclear what English language proficiency requirements apply to the applicant.
In light of this, the Tribunal has determined that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.
DECISION
The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:
·cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
M. Edgoose
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
0
0
0