Ng (Migration)

Case

[2020] AATA 2296

25 May 2020


Ng (Migration) [2020] AATA 2296 (25 May 2020)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Chin Chung Ng

CASE NUMBER:  1914916

DIBP REFERENCE(S):  BCC20191195294

MEMBER:Denise Connolly

DATE:25 May 2020

PLACE OF DECISION:  Sydney

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 485 visa:

·Regulation 2.03AA(2).

Statement made on 25 May 2020 at 3:38pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa – Subclass 485 (Temporary Graduate) – character test – statement from an appropriate authority – National Police Certificate Complete Disclosure – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), r 2.03AA; Schedule 2, cl 485.216; Schedule 4, PIC 4001

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

  2. The applicant applied for the visa on 9 March 2019. The criteria for a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa are set out in Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations). Additional criteria are prescribed in Division 2.1 of Part 2 of the Regulations.

  3. Regulation 2.03AA of the Regulations applies where a person is required to satisfy Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4001 or 4002: r.2.03AA(1). In this case, cl.485.216 of Schedule 2 of the Regulations requires the applicant to meet PIC 4001. The applicant is therefore required to satisfy the criterion in r.2.03AA(2).

  4. Regulation 2.03AA(2)(a) requires that, if requested, the applicant has provided a statement from a relevant authority in a country where the person resides or has resided that provides evidence about whether or not the person has a criminal history. Regulation 2.03AA(2)(b) requires that, if requested, the applicant has provided a completed approved Form 80. The Tribunal may waive the requirement in r.2.03AA(2)(a) if it is not reasonable for the applicant to provide the statement: r.2.03AA(3). The Tribunal cannot waive the requirement for the applicant to provide a completed Form 80.

  5. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 10 June 2019 on the basis that the applicant did not meet r.2.03AA because he had not provided a statement from the relevant authority sought by the delegate on 8 May 2019.

  6. The applicant has since provided to the Tribunal the statement sought. The Tribunal is now able to remit the matter so there was no need for a hearing.

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

  7. The issue in this case is whether the applicant has provided a statement by an appropriate authority that provides evidence about whether or not the person has a criminal history.

    Has the applicant provided a statement from an appropriate authority?

  8. On 8 May 2019 the delegate made a request for the applicant to provide his Australian Federal Police Complete Disclosure certificate. The applicant did not provide it within the time given.

  9. The applicant has now provided to the Tribunal a National Police Certificate – Complete Disclosure certificate issued by the AFP on 7 April 2020 certifying there are no disclosable outcomes recorded against the applicant, born 3 October 1994.

  10. The applicant has now provided the statement sought by the delegate, from an appropriate authority, the AFP, and therefore meets r.2.03AA(2)(a).

    Conclusion

  11. There is no evidence that the delegate made a request for the applicant to provide a completed approved Form 80, therefore the requirement in r.2.03AA(2)(b) does not apply.

  12. On the basis of the above findings, the applicant meets r.2.03AA(2).

    DECISION

  13. The Tribunal remits the application for a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 485 visa:

    ·Regulation 2.03AA(2).

    Denise Connolly
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Remedies

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0