Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd v The J Aron Corporation and The Goldman Sachs Group Inc

Case

[2007] NSWCA 195

10 August 2007


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd v The J Aron Corporation and The Goldman Sachs Group Inc [2007] NSWCA 195 [2007] NSWCA 195 10 August 2007

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd (Newmont) sought to set aside an order made by White J in related proceedings involving The J Aron Corporation and The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. The dispute concerned an application to amend or set aside a previous court order, which had significant implications for other ongoing litigation. The matter was heard in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.

The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the original order made by White J should be set aside or amended. Specifically, the court considered whether the order had been made erroneously, resolving an issue not adjudicated upon, and whether the court possessed the power to correct such an error under the slip rule (Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 36.17) or its inherent jurisdiction. The court also considered the defence of res judicata or estoppel raised by the respondents, and whether the judge who made the original order was disqualified from hearing the application to amend it due to potential bias.

The Court of Appeal reasoned that the original order, by including the words "Declare that", had the effect of making a declaration that had not been sought or adjudicated upon by the court. This constituted an error that fell within the scope of the slip rule, allowing for correction to give effect to the court's objective intention. The court found that the judge was not disqualified from hearing the application. Leave to appeal was granted, and the orders of White J were varied by deleting the words "Declare that" and capitalising the subsequent letter in the relevant parts of the order. The appeal was ultimately dismissed with costs.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

  • Contract Law

Legal Concepts

  • Res Judicata

  • Estoppel

  • Appeal

  • Costs

  • Remedies

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

531

Dunstan v Higham (No 2) [2016] ACTCA 28
Dunstan v Higham (No 2) [2016] ACTCA 28
Wickey v The Queen (No 2) [2012] ACTCA 51
Cases Cited

37

Statutory Material Cited

4