Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Newland International Investments Pty Ltd v Lane Cove Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1531 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 28 August, 1, 7, 14 & 15 September 2017 Date of orders: 25 September 2017 Decision date: 25 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Newland International Investments Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Lane Cove Municipal Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitor:
Mr G Hartley, Harley Solicitors(Applicant)
Ms J Corradini-Bird, Marsdens Law Group (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/129764 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The applicant is granted leave to rely on the plans listed under Condition 1(a) below the heading ‘A. Approved Development’ in Annexure ‘A’.
Appeal upheld; and
The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs under s.97B of the Environmental Planning Assessment Act 1979 in the agreed amount of $3,500.00.
Development application number DA 92/2016 for demolition of existing structures and construction of seven townhouses with associated site-works and landscaping is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure ‘A’
……………………….
Commissioner Chilcott
Annexure A (365 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Newland International Investments Pty Ltd v Lane Cove Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1531
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1531
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court found that the Council had exercised its discretion correctly in denying the development application. The decision was not based on irrelevant considerations, nor was it unreasonable. The Court held that the Council had properly considered the relevant planning and environmental factors, including the potential impact on the local community and the surrounding environment. The Court also found that the Council's decision was supported by evidence and was in accordance with the relevant planning laws and policies. The Court dismissed the application for judicial review and affirmed the Council's decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.