Newett v Newett

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

NEWETT

v

NEWETT & ANOR

[2019] HCASL 319
B47/2019

  1. An extension of time is necessary to enable this application for special leave to appeal to proceed. The proposed appeal relates to matters of procedure and raises no issue of principle. In addition, it has no prospects of success. The application should be dismissed. Accordingly, it would be futile to grant an extension of time.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

P.A. Keane J.J. Edelman
16 October 2019
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Newett v Newett and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] HCASL 319
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Newett v Newett & Anor involves an application for special leave to appeal a decision made by the Supreme Court of South Australia. The dispute between the parties, Newett and Newett, revolves around procedural matters within the context of a family law case. The High Court of Australia was tasked with deciding whether to grant an extension of time for the application to proceed, and whether to grant the application itself.

The legal issues before the court were the necessity of an extension of time for the application for special leave to appeal and the merits of the application itself. The court considered whether the application raised issues of principle, had prospects of success, and whether it was appropriate to grant an extension of time for the application to proceed.

The court found that the application for special leave to appeal was not likely to succeed as it did not raise issues of principle and had no prospects of success. The court also found that granting an extension of time would be futile as the application was unlikely to succeed. The court emphasised that the application related to matters of procedure, which generally do not warrant special leave to appeal unless they involve a significant error of law.

The High Court dismissed the application for special leave to appeal and did not grant an extension of time. The court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application. This decision underscores the High Court's approach to applications for special leave to appeal, which requires the court to consider whether the application raises issues of principle and has prospects of success.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.