New South Wales Bar Association v Howen
Case
•
[2008] NSWADT 148
•22 May 2008
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
New South Wales Bar Association v Howen [2008] NSWADT 148
[2008] NSWADT 148
22 May 2008
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The New South Wales Bar Association brought a disciplinary application against a barrister, Howen, due to his failure to comply with a section 152 Notice to provide information and produce documents, as well as a failure to comply with an undertaking given to the Bar Association. The court was required to determine whether the Bar Association had established a case against the barrister for professional misconduct. The legal issues revolved around the interpretation of the section 152 Notice, the nature of the undertaking given, and whether the failure to comply with these constituted professional misconduct warranting disciplinary action.
The court found that the Bar Association had indeed established a case against the barrister for professional misconduct. It was determined that the barrister had failed to comply with the section 152 Notice by not providing the required information and documents. Additionally, the court found that the undertaking given by the barrister had not been fulfilled. The court held that these failures constituted a serious breach of the professional standards expected of a barrister and amounted to professional misconduct.
Consequently, the court ordered that a hearing as to penalty be fixed for a later date, which was set for 27 June, 2008. This decision was made to allow the parties to present their arguments and evidence regarding the appropriate penalty for the established professional misconduct. The court's reasoning was based on the serious nature of the breaches and the need for the disciplinary process to be thorough and fair.
The court found that the Bar Association had indeed established a case against the barrister for professional misconduct. It was determined that the barrister had failed to comply with the section 152 Notice by not providing the required information and documents. Additionally, the court found that the undertaking given by the barrister had not been fulfilled. The court held that these failures constituted a serious breach of the professional standards expected of a barrister and amounted to professional misconduct.
Consequently, the court ordered that a hearing as to penalty be fixed for a later date, which was set for 27 June, 2008. This decision was made to allow the parties to present their arguments and evidence regarding the appropriate penalty for the established professional misconduct. The court's reasoning was based on the serious nature of the breaches and the need for the disciplinary process to be thorough and fair.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Professional Discipline Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Failure to Comply
-
Admissibility of Evidence
-
Contempt of Court
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Council of the Law Society of NSW v Ross [2013] NSWADT 106
Cases Citing This Decision
12
Council of the Law Society of NSW v Ross
[2013] NSWADT 106
Council of the Law Society of NSW v Autore
[2012] NSWADT 139
Council of the Law Society of NSW v Kim
[2012] NSWADT 45
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
2
Law Society of New South Wales v Waterhouse
[2002] NSWADT 204
Law Society of New South Wales v Konstantinidis (No 2)
[2005] NSWADT 87