Nelson and Nelson

Case

[2011] FamCA 760

9 August 2011


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NELSON & NELSON [2011] FamCA 760
FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – With whom a child spends time - orders
APPLICANT: Mr Nelson
RESPONDENT: Ms Nelson
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: David Stagg Tonkin
FILE NUMBER: MLC 5516 of 2009
DATE DELIVERED: 9 August 2011
PLACE DELIVERED: Melbourne
PLACE HEARD: Melbourne
JUDGMENT OF: Dessau J
HEARING DATE: 9 August 2011

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr Howe
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Peter Lynch
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Ms Glaister
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Bowlen Dunstan & Associates
COUNSEL FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Mr Marchetti
SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: David Stagg Tonkin

Orders

  1. So I am going to make orders in accordance with the minutes dated today’s date.  They are final consent orders.

  2. I will direct they remain on the Court file.

  3. The solicitor for the applicant husband will prepare the orders within seven days.

  4. Now, on that basis, the ICL and counsellor are excused.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Nelson & Nelson is approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE

FILE NUMBER: MLC 5516 of 2009

Mr Nelson

Applicant

And

Ms Nelson

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. First, can I just say that the good work that you have done should not be eclipsed by the fact that I have to make a decision on this very small point.  And it is not a point about which I am overly troubled.  I will do the best that I can from the children’s points of view, but it is, I emphasise, really a very small point.  I would ask you to stand back for a moment and just realise how very small it is because you could probably end up counting how many days you are actually talking about on one hand – it might just slip into the second hand, but not by much.  It is between time with the father each Monday, or each alternate Monday, for the limited period while the regime is building up.

  2. The important thing is that there is a regime in place that is going to see these children beginning to spend incrementally more and more time with their father on a basis that will properly build.

  3. I am persuaded by the ICLs submissions as to just leaving the time at the moment on the alternate Mondays, because that is going to lead into a regime that is going to be alternate Mondays.  And I am particularly attracted to the idea, in these early days, of you two not having to have more contact than necessary.

  4. Hopefully, everything will get better and better between you but, realistically, it will not suddenly be easy.  So for the children I will just make it a little bit easier by having one less area for any anxiety between the two of you that will then rub off on them.  So I am going to leave it as alternate Mondays.

RECORDED:  NOT TRANSCRIBED

ORDER DELIVERED

I certify that the preceding four (4) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of the Honourable Justice Dessau delivered on 9 August 2011.

Associate: 

Date:  9 August 2011

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Consent

  • Costs

  • Remedies

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0