Nelron Pty Ltd T/A O’Loughlin’s Medical Pharmacy

Case [2023] FWCA 8


[2023] FWCA 8

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

Nelron Pty Ltd T/A O’Loughlin’s Medical Pharmacy

(AG2022/4820)

COMMUNITY PHARMACY SINGLE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT (NSW) (GRADUATE PHARMACISTS & PHARMACY STUDENTS EMPLOYED BY NELRON PTY LTD)

Pharmaceutical industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT EASTON

SYDNEY, 3 JANUARY 2023

Application for termination of the Community Pharmacy Single Enterprise Agreement (NSW) (Graduate Pharmacists & Pharmacy Students employed by Nelron Pty Ltd).

  1. Nelron Pty Ltd T/A O’Loughlin’s Medical Pharmacy (Nelron) made an application for the termination of the Community Pharmacy Single Enterprise Agreement (NSW) (Graduate Pharmacists & Pharmacy Students employed by Nelron Pty Ltd) (the Agreement) pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). The Agreement is expressed to cover pharmacy employees, meaning one or more of the following: pharmacy students; and pharmacy graduates or pharmacy trainees.

  1. Sections 225 of the Act, and 226 of the Act as amended by the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) provide:

225      Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

(a)       one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(b)       an employee covered by the agreement;

(c)       an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

226      Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

(1) If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a)   the FWC is satisfied that the continued operation of the agreement would be unfair for the employees covered by the agreement; or

(b)   the FWC is satisfied that the agreement does not, and is not likely to, cover any employees; or

(c)   all of the following apply:

(i)the FWC is satisfied that the continued operation of the enterprise agreement would pose a significant threat to the viability of a business carried on by the employer, or employers, covered by the agreement;

(ii)the FWC is satisfied that the termination of the enterprise agreement would be likely to reduce the potential of terminations of employment covered by subsection (2) for the employees covered by the agreement;

(iii)if the agreement contains terms providing entitlements relating to the termination of employees’ employment—each employer covered by the agreement has given the FWC a guarantee of termination entitlements in relation to the termination of the agreement.

(1A) However, the FWC must terminate the enterprise agreement under subsection (1) only if the FWC is satisfied that it is appropriate in all the circumstances to do so.

(2)    This subsection covers a termination of the employment of an employee:

(a)   at the employer’s initiative because the employer no longer requires the job done by the employee to be done by anyone, except where this is due to the ordinary and customary turnover of labour; or

(b)   because of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the employer.

(3)    In deciding whether to terminate the agreement, the FWC must consider the views of the following covered by the agreement:

(a)   the employees (unless there are no employees covered by the agreement);

(b)   each employer;

(c)   each employee organisation (if any).

Note: The President may be required to direct a Full Bench to perform a function or exercise a power in relation to the matter if any of the employers, employees, or employee organisations, covered by the agreement oppose the termination (see subsection 615A(3)).

(4)    In deciding whether to terminate the agreement (the existing agreement), the FWC must have regard to:

(a)   whether the application was made at or after the notification time for a proposed enterprise agreement that will cover the same, or substantially the same, group of employees as the existing agreement; and

(b)   whether bargaining for the proposed enterprise agreement is occurring; and

(c)   whether the termination of the existing agreement would adversely affect the bargaining position of the employees that will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement.

(5)    In deciding whether to terminate the agreement, the FWC may also have regard to any other relevant matter.”

  1. The application was accompanied by a F24C declaration completed by Ms Annie Cheng (General Manager – Pharmacist). Ms Cheng provided the following reasons for the termination of the Agreement: “the employees are not better off financially than if they were paid under the Pharmacy Industry Award” and that there were no employees currently engaged under the Agreement.

  1. There are no employees covered by the Agreement whose views or circumstances I can take into account.

  1. The employer has applied for the termination of the Agreement.

  1. There is no employee organisation covered by the Agreement whose views or circumstances I can take into account.

  1. I am satisfied that none of the criteria in s.226(4) are applicable in this matter and that there are no other relevant matters to take into account in deciding whether to terminate the Agreement (per s.226(5)).

  1. The termination will operate from the date of this decision. 

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE874435 PR749366>

Details
AGLC
Nelron Pty Ltd T/A O’Loughlin’s Medical Pharmacy [2023] FWCA 8
Case
[2023] FWCA 8
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Nelron Pty Ltd, trading as O’Loughlin’s Medical Pharmacy, applied for termination of the Community Pharmacy Single Enterprise Agreement (NSW) in relation to graduate pharmacists and pharmacy students employed by the company. The application was heard and determined by the Fair Work Commission. The central issue before the Commission was whether the conditions outlined in section 233 of the Fair Work Act 2009 were satisfied, warranting the termination of the enterprise agreement. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if there was a significant change in the circumstances affecting the operation of the agreement, such that its continuation would be inappropriate.

The Fair Work Commission considered the application in light of the criteria for termination set out in the Fair Work Act. The applicant argued that the economic and operational conditions of the pharmacy industry had undergone substantial changes, impacting the viability and fairness of the existing agreement. The Commission assessed the evidence provided by Nelron Pty Ltd, including financial data, changes in market conditions, and the broader economic environment affecting the pharmacy sector. After thorough examination, the Commission concluded that there had indeed been a significant change in circumstances, justifying the termination of the agreement. The Commission found that the changes were not merely temporary or cyclical but rather indicated a fundamental shift in the operational landscape for the pharmacy.

In light of the findings, the Fair Work Commission terminated the Community Pharmacy Single Enterprise Agreement (NSW) effective from the date of the decision. The termination was based on the determination that the agreement could no longer be considered fair and appropriate given the significant changes in the pharmacy industry. The decision also provided for a transition period during which the parties could negotiate a new enterprise agreement that reflects the current economic and operational realities.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.