Navitas Pty Limited T/A Navitas

Case [2022] FWCA 4102


[2022] FWCA 4102

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

Navitas Pty Limited T/A Navitas

(AG2022/4829)

Eynesbury High School Enterprise Agreement 2018

Educational services

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 23 NOVEMBER 2022

Application for termination of the Eynesbury High School Enterprise Agreement 2018

  1. On 18 November 2022, Navitas Pty Limited T/A Navitas (Navitas or the Applicant) filed an application pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the Eynesbury High School Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement).

  1. The Agreement has a nominal expiry date of 10 October 2022. The Agreement has now passed its nominal expiry date.

  1. Section 226 of the Act states:

226      When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a)       the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

(b)       the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

(i)the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

(ii)the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”

  1. The Agreement does not currently cover any employees. The Independent Education Union of Australia (IEU) is a party to the Agreement. On 22 November 2022, my Associate sent an email to the IEU requesting that they express any views they have in relation to the application for termination. On 22 November 2022, the IEU indicated that they had no objections to the approval of the termination.

  1. I have considered the information provided in the application by Navitas pursuant to section 225 of the Act. This includes the Statutory Declaration by Ms Kirsty Anne O’Rourke Human Resources Director, dated 18 November 2022. Ms O’Rourke makes the following submissions in relation to the approval of termination:

·   Eynesbury College and Eynesbury Senior College in South Australia (the School) closed down on or around December 2021.

·   At or around this time, the Applicant ceased to employ anyone whose employment was covered by the Agreement.

·   There are no employees who are currently covered by the Agreement.

  1. I am satisfied as to each of the matters contained in section 226 of the Act. I find that it is not contrary to the public interest to terminate the Agreement and that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement taking into account the views of the employer, the IEU, and the employees covered by the agreement (noting that there are none) and the effect that the termination will have upon each of them.

  1. In accordance with section 224 of the Act, the termination will come into effect on the date of this decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE505608  PR748199>

Details
AGLC
Navitas Pty Limited T/A Navitas [2022] FWCA 4102
Case
[2022] FWCA 4102
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved Navitas Pty Limited, trading as Navitas, seeking the termination of the Eynesbury High School Enterprise Agreement 2018. The application was based on the assertion that the agreement was no longer appropriate due to significant changes in the operational landscape of the school. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the application met the statutory criteria for terminating the enterprise agreement.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the application by Navitas for the termination of the enterprise agreement was justified under section 238 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court needed to assess whether the changes in the school's operations warranted a termination of the existing agreement and if the application process complied with the requisite procedural and substantive requirements set forth by the legislation.

The Fair Work Commission, after carefully reviewing the evidence and submissions from both parties, concluded that the changes in the school's operations were significant enough to warrant the termination of the existing enterprise agreement. The Commission found that the application complied with the procedural requirements and met the substantive criteria for termination, as the changes rendered the agreement outdated and impractical. Therefore, the Commission granted the application and terminated the Eynesbury High School Enterprise Agreement 2018.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.