Navanitham (Migration)

Case

[2019] AATA 3316

24 July 2019


Navanitham (Migration) [2019] AATA 3316 (24 July 2019)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Navinnraj Navanitham

CASE NUMBER:  1918394

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2019/2278309

MEMBER:Bridget Cullen

DATE:24 July 2019

PLACE OF DECISION:  Brisbane

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criterion for a Subclass 485 visa:

·cl.485.231 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

Statement made on 24 July 2019 at 12:16pm

CATCHWORDS

MIGRATION – Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa – Subclass 485 (Temporary Graduate) – Post-Study Work stream – Australian study requirement – Bachelor of Photography – course completion date – confirmation letter from University received – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), rr 1.03, 1.15F; Schedule 2, cl 485.231

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 8 July 2019 to refuse to grant the applicant a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

  2. The applicant applied for the visa on 26 April 2019. Visa Class VC contains Subclass 485 (Temporary Graduate). The criteria for the grant of a Subclass 485 visa are set out in Part 485 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations), including criteria in different streams. In this case, the applicant is seeking to meet the criteria in the Post-Study Work stream, which include cl.485.231

  3. The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of the applicant's course completion date had not been provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

    Clause 485.231 requires the applicant to hold a qualification or qualifications of a kind specified by the Minister, conferred or awarded by an educational institution specified by the Minister, for which the applicant’s study must have satisfied the ‘Australian study requirement’ in the 6 months immediately before the day the visa application was made. The issue in the present case is whether the applicant meets those requirements.

    Does the applicant hold a specified qualification?

  4. Subclause 485.231(1) requires the applicant to hold a qualification or qualifications of a kind specified by the Minister. The relevant instrument for this purpose is IMMI 13/013. In this case, the applicant holds a Bachelor of Photography which is a qualification specified in that instrument.

  5. Accordingly, cl.485.231(1) is met.

    Was the applicant’s qualification conferred or awarded by a specified educational institution?

  6. Subclause 485.231(2) requires the applicant’s qualification or qualifications to be conferred or awarded by an educational institution specified by the Minister. The relevant instrument for this purpose is IMMI 13/031.

  7. In this case, the applicant’s qualification was conferred or awarded by Griffith University which is an educational institution specified in that instrument.

  8. Accordingly, cl.485.231(2) is met.

    Does the applicant’s study for the specified qualification meet the Australian study requirement?

  9. Subclause 485.231(3) requires that the applicant’s study for the specified qualification or qualifications met the ‘Australian study requirement’ in the 6 months immediately before the day the visa application was made.

  10. Under r.1.15F(1) of the Regulations, a person satisfies the ‘Australian study requirement’ if the person satisfies the Minister that the person has completed 1 or more degrees, diplomas or trade qualifications for award by an Australian educational institution as a result of a course or courses:

    ·that are registered courses,

    ·that were completed in a total of at least 16 calendar months,

    ·that were completed as a result of a total of at least 2 academic years study,

    ·for which all instruction was conducted in English, and

    ·that the applicant undertook while in Australia as the holder of a visa authorising the applicant to study.

  11. ‘Degree’, ‘diploma’, ‘trade qualification’, ‘registered course’, ‘completed’ and ‘academic year’ are all defined terms (see rr.1.03, 1.15F and 2.26AC(6), and cl.485.111). ‘Completed’, in relation to a degree, diploma or trade qualification, means having met the academic requirements for its award (r.1.15F(2)). For the purposes of this case, one ‘academic year’ is at least a total of 46 weeks, being the duration of a course registered under the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000: LIN 19/085.

  12. On 9 July 2019 the Tribunal received a letter from the Academic Registrar at Griffith University that confirmed the applicant had a course start date of 29 February July 2016 and his course completion date was 5 March 2019.

  13. The applicant completed the Bachelor of Photography, with a program duration of 3-years, and a full time study load. As the applicant applied for the visa on 26 April 2019, his course completion on 5 March 2019 shows that he satisfied the Australian study requirement in the period of six months before the application was made.

  14. In light of the new evidence received, the Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant’s study for the specified qualification satisfied the Australian study requirement in the 6 months immediately preceding the date of the visa application.

  15. Accordingly, cl.485.231(3) is met..

  16. On the basis of the above findings, the Tribunal finds that the applicant meets cl.485.231. The appropriate course is to remit the visa application to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for the visa.

    DECISION

  17. The Tribunal remits the application for a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criterion for a Subclass 485 visa:

    ·cl.485.231 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

    Bridget Cullen
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Jurisdiction

  • Statutory Construction

  • Remedies

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0