Naval Financial Regulations (Amendment) (Cth)

Case
No judgment structure available for this case.

STATUTORY RULES 1964, No. 91.(g)

Rate of travelling allowance in Australia.

1. Regulation 201 of the Naval Financial Regulations is amended by omitting the table in sub-regulation (1.) and inserting in its stead the following table:—

Rank or Rating and Pay Seniority (if any).

Rate per day.

First twenty-one days' residence in a Capital City.

First twenty-one days' residence in a place other than a Capital City.

£

s.

d.

£

s.

d.

Commodore or higher rank.............................................

6

15

0

5

0

0

Captain..........................................................................

4

18

0

3

6

0

Commander, Commander (S.D.) or relative rank..............

4

12

0

3

6

0

Lieutenant-Commander..................................................

4

5

0

3

6

0

Lieutenant-Commander (S.D.) or relative rank–

with not less than eight years' pay seniority...............

4

5

0

3

6

0

with less than eight years' pay seniority....................

4

5

0

3

0

0

Lieutenant.....................................................................

4

5

0

3

0

0

Lieutenant (S.D.) or relative rank or lower rank................

4

5

0

2

14

0

Chief Petty Officer or lower rating..................................

4

5

0

2

14

0

(g) Made under the Naval Defence Act 1910–1952 on 17 July, 1964; notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on 20 July, 1964.

Application.

2. The rates of travelling allowance specified in the table in sub-regulation (1.) of regulation 201 of the Naval Financial Regulations, as amended by the last preceding regulation, in relation to officers of the rank of Commodore or a higher rank, apply to travelling allowance paid or payable in accordance with that first-mentioned sub-regulation—

(a)in the case of travelling allowance for residence in a capital city—in respect of the nineteenth day of March, 1964, or any subsequent day; and

(b

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0