NAUE v MIMIA

[2005] HCATrans 944

[2005] HCATrans 944

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Sydney  No S49 of 2005

B e t w e e n -

NAUE

Applicant

and

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders

HAYNE J
CALLINAN J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 17 NOVEMBER 2005, AT 9.28 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

HAYNE J:   The applicant seeks special leave to appeal against the orders of the Full Court of the Federal Court dismissing his appeal against the orders of a single Judge of that Court.  The latter orders dismissed the applicant’s application for constitutional writs and associated relief.

Because the applicant is unrepresented the application for special leave falls to be dealt with pursuant to rule 41.10 of the High Court Rules 2004.

The decision of the Full Court is not attended by doubt.  An appeal to this Court would enjoy no prospect of success.  The application for special leave should be dismissed.

Pursuant to rule 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. I publish that disposition.

AT 9.29 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED