National Union of Workers v Paperlinx Australia Pty Ltd

Case

[2012] FWA 8920

18 OCTOBER 2012

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2012] FWA 8920


FAIR WORK AUSTRALIA

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.448—Protected action

National Union of Workers
v
Paperlinx Australia Pty Ltd
(B2012/1711)

COMMISSIONER LEE

MELBOURNE, 18 OCTOBER 2012

Application for revocation of protected action ballot order made in B2012/1616.

[1] An application has been made pursuant to s.448 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by the National Union of Workers (NUW) to revoke an order for a protected action ballot. The application was lodged on 17 October 2012. It relates to an order 1 which I issued on 21 September 2012 in an application by the NUW for a protected action ballot in matter B2012/1616.

[2] Section 448 of the Act deals with revocation of protected action ballot orders and is set out below:

    “448 Revocation of protected action ballot order

    (1) An applicant for a protected action ballot order may apply to FWA, at any time before voting in the protected action ballot closes, to revoke the order.

    (2) If an application to revoke a protected action ballot order is made, FWA must revoke the order.”

[3] The NUW was the applicant for the protected action ballot in matter B2012/1616 and is therefore eligible to make this application under s.448 of the Act. The voting pursuant to the order has not closed. This application is therefore made within the time prescribed by s.448(1) of the Act. In these circumstances, s.448(2) of the Act provides that Fair Work Australia must revoke the protected action ballot.

[4] An Order 2 will issue accordingly.

COMMISSIONER

 1   PR529491

 2   PR530375

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR530374>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0