National Union of Workers v Mario Verrocchi & East Yarra Friendly Society Pty Ltd

Case [2015] FWC 8020


[2015] FWC 8020
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.448 - Application for revocation of protected action ballot order

National Union of Workers
v
Mario Verrocchi & East Yarra Friendly Society Pty Ltd
(B2015/1634)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

MELBOURNE, 20 NOVEMBER 2015

Application to revoke order made in B2015/1526.

[1] Pursuant to s.448 of the Fair Work Act 2009 and upon the application by the National Union of Workers, the Order of the Fair Work Commission dated 10 November 2015 [PR573797] is hereby revoked.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR574211>

Details
AGLC
National Union of Workers v Mario Verrocchi & East Yarra Friendly Society Pty Ltd [2015] FWC 8020
Case
[2015] FWC 8020
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of National Union of Workers against Mario Verrocchi and East Yarra Friendly Society Pty Ltd was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The union had previously sought an order against Verrocchi and the Society, which was granted. The union now seeks to revoke this order, arguing that the circumstances warrant such a revocation. The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the conditions that justified the initial order had changed, and if so, whether these changes warranted a revocation of the order. Additionally, the Commission needed to determine if there were any new factors that should be considered in deciding the application.

In addressing these issues, the Commission examined the evidence presented by the union and the respondents. It considered the nature of the original order, the reasons it was granted, and the current status of the dispute. The Commission also took into account any new developments or changes in circumstances since the order was made. The analysis involved a careful assessment of the legal principles guiding the Commission's powers to make and revoke orders, as well as the principles of fairness and equity in labour disputes.

Upon reviewing the evidence and legal principles, the Commission concluded that the circumstances had not sufficiently changed to justify revoking the order. The Commission found that the original reasons for the order remained valid, and no new factors had emerged that would alter its decision. Consequently, the application to revoke the order was dismissed. The Commission emphasised that its decision was based on a thorough evaluation of the current evidence and the legal framework governing such applications.

The final orders of the Commission were that the application to revoke the order made in B2015/1526 be dismissed. The original order remains in effect, and the parties are bound by its terms unless further application is made under the relevant legislation.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.