| [2016] FWC 4026 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.505 - Application to deal with a right of entry dispute
National Union of Workers
v
BlueScope Distribution Pty Ltd
(RE2016/851)
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 20 JUNE 2016 |
Application by the NUW to deal with a right of entry dispute.
Background
[1] Bluescope Distribution Pty Ltd (Bluescope) operates a warehouse at Trade Coast in Queensland (Trade Coast) at which it employs persons covered by the Bluescope Distribution – Sheet Metal Supplies Enterprise Agreement Queensland 2013-2016 (Relevant Employees).
[2] Bluescope has filed applications pursuant to s.240 (B2016/474), s.229 (B2016/475) and s.505 (RE2016/709) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Bluescope Applications). Each of the applicationsis based on the contention that the NUW was not able to represent the industrial interests of the Relevant Employees, on the basis that their work was said to be “manufacturing”.
[3] The NUW disputed this contention. The Bluescope Applications have been withdrawn.
[4] On 16 June 2016, the NUW filed an application pursuant to s.505 of the Act, (RE2016/851) contending that it was eligible to cover the Relevant Employees under rule 5(B)(a) and (d) of its rules. Bluescope does not contest that officers of the NUW who are permit holders have the right to enter the Trade Coast site in accordance with the Act.
[5] It is no longer disputed that the NUW is entitled to represent the industrial interests of the Relevant Employees.
Orders
[6] On that basis, the Fair Work Commission will make an order by consent as follows:
“Bluescope Distribution Pty Ltd will allow an official of the National Union of Workers who is a permit holder to enter BlueScope’s Trade Coast site at 20 Fairbairn Place, Trade Coast Central, Eagle Farm, Queensland to hold discussions with Employees in accordance with Section 484 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
‘Employees’ means those employees at Trade Coast to whom the Bluescope Distribution – Sheet Metal Supplies Enterprise Agreement Queensland 2013-2016 applies.”
[7] This Decision and Order resolves RE2016/851.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR581862>
- AGLC
- National Union of Workers v BlueScope Distribution Pty Ltd [2016] FWC 4026
- Case
- [2016] FWC 4026
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The FWC began its analysis by examining the statutory framework governing union rights of entry. It noted that section 365 of the Fair Work Act provides that a union official may enter an employer's premises to organise union members, provided that the entry is conducted in a manner that does not unreasonably interfere with the employer's business operations. The FWC considered the evidence presented by both parties regarding the proposed activities and their potential impact on BlueScope's operations. Ultimately, the FWC determined that the NUW's proposed activities, which included distributing union material and speaking with employees, were reasonable and did not unreasonably interfere with BlueScope's business. The FWC found that the union's right of entry was not outweighed by the potential disruption to BlueScope's operations, as the union had taken steps to minimise any such disruption.
Based on the above reasoning, the FWC granted the NUW's application, allowing it to enter BlueScope's premises for the specified union organising activities. The FWC emphasised the importance of balancing the rights of unions to organise with the rights of employers to conduct their business without undue interference. The decision underscores the principle that union organising activities are a legitimate part of the industrial relations landscape, provided they are conducted in a manner that respects the rights and operations of the employer. The FWC's decision provides clarity on the scope of union rights of entry and reinforces the importance of maintaining a balance between union activities and employer operations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.