National Security (Evidence) Regulations (Cth)
STATUTORY RULES.
REGULATIONS UNDER THE NATIONAL SECURITY ACT 1939–1943.*
I,
THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the
advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations
under the
Dated this twenty-seventh day of July, 1944.
GOWRIE
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
H. V. EVATT
for Minister of State for Defence.
National Security (Evidence) Regulations.
“(3.) In any proceedings
in respect of a contravention of paragraph (
“(4.) In any proceedings
in respect of a contravention of paragraph (
* Notified in the
4523.—Price 5d
(
a ) by omitting from sub-regulation (2.) of regulation 20 the words “or his known character as proved,”;(
b ) by omitting sub-regulation (1b.) of regulation 40a;(
c ) by omitting from sub-regulation (2.) of regulation 73a—(i) the words “, or to be authorized by him”;
(ii) the words “or that the document was authorized by him”; and
(iii) the words “or with his authority”; and
(
d ) by omitting sub-regulation (3.) of that regulation.
“9. In any prosecution in respect of any contravention of regulation 6, regulation 7 or regulation 8 of these Regulations, a certificate in writing, signed by the Director-General or a person authorized in writing by the Director-General to make requirements under any of these Regulations, certifying that—
(
a ) the Director-General or the person so authorized, as the case may be, considered it necessary or expedient in the interests of the defence of the Commonwealth or the efficient prosecution of the war to make the requirement; or(
b ) the Director-General hold the opinion that a statement appearing in a newspaper or periodical concerning a matter connected with the prosecution of the war was not in conformity with the facts or was a misrepresentation of the facts,
shall
be
(
a ) by adding at the end of sub-regulation (1.) of regulation 51 the following proviso:—“Provided that, in any prosecution under paragraph (
c ) of this sub-regulation, it shall be a defence for any person having in his possession a counterfeit or forged ration ticket or licence, to show that he believed, on reasonable grounds, that the ration ticket or licence was genuine.”; and(
b ) by repealing regulation 52.
“(3.) In any proceedings
in respect of a contravention of paragraph (
“(4.) In any proceedings
in respect of a contravention of paragraph (
(
a ) by inserting in sub-regulation (2.) of regulation 29, after the word “shall”, the words “, for the purposes of the last preceding sub-regulation,”;(
b ) by adding at the end of sub-regulation (3.) of that regulation the words “, unless the Court is satisfied that the sale or offering for sale took place without his knowledge and that he has systematically used all due diligence to secure observance of these Regulations.”;(
c ) by omitting from regulation 32a the words “contained in the information or complaint” and inserting in their stead the words “made in writing and served on the defendant as prescribed”;(
d ) by adding at the end of that regulation the following sub-regulations:—“(3.) Any evidence given by witnesses in support or rebuttal of a matter so averred shall be considered on its merits and the credibility and probative value of such evidence shall neither be increased nor diminished by reason of this regulation.
“(4.) This regulation shall not apply to an averment of the intent of the defendant.
“(5.) No averment shall be made under this regulation unless the Crown Solicitor, or the Assistant Crown Solicitor or a Deputy Crown Solicitor is satisfied that the averment is reasonably necessary for the due administration of justice and will not impose hardship upon or occasion injustice to the defendant and certifies in writing accordingly on the paper containing the averment.
“(6.) An averment shall not be evidence for the purposes of this regulation unless it has been served on the defendant in the same manner as the process requiring his attendance before the Court.”.
(
a ) by omitting sub-regulation (4.) of regulation 35; and(
b ) by inserting in regulation 36, after the word “Regulations” (last occurring), the words “, unless the Court is satisfied that the purchase, acquisition, transfer, supply, sale or disposal took place without his knowledge and that he has systematically used all due diligence to secure observance of these Regulations”.
“(2.) In any proceedings for a contravention of this regulation, if all the facts and circumstances constituting the contravention, other than the reason for the defendant’s action, are proved, it shall lie upon the defendant to prove that he was not actuated by the reason alleged in the charge.”.
(
a ) by omitting from sub-regulation (4.) of regulation 93 the word “conclusive”; and(
b ) by omitting from sub-regulation (12.) of regulation 103 the word “conclusive”.
(
a ) by omitting sub-regulation (5.) of regulation 9aa and inserting in its stead the following sub-regulation:—“(5.) For the purposes of this regulation, anything done contrary to the provisions of this regulation, at the place of business of any person, by an employee of that person acting in the course of his employment, shall be deemed also to have been done by that person unless the Court is satisfied that it was done without his knowledge and that he has systematically used all due diligence to secure observance of these Regulations.”; and
(
b ) by repealing regulation 15.
“(4.) In any proceedings for a contravention of this regulation, if all the facts and circumstances constituting the contravention, other than the reason for the defendant’s action, are proved, it shall be upon the defendant to prove that he was not actuated by the reason alleged in the charge.”.
“(3.) In any proceedings
in respect of a contravention of paragraph (
“(4.) In any proceedings
in respect of a contravention of paragraph (
By Authority: L. F. Johnston, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra.
4523.—2
0
0
0