National Security (Contracts Adjustment) Regulations (Amendment) (Cth)
STATUTORY RULES.
REGULATIONS UNDER THE NATIONAL SECURITY ACT 1939–1940.*
I,
THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the
advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations
under the
Dated this fourth day of June, 1942.
(SGD.) GOWRIE.
Governor-General
.
By His Excellency’s Command,
for and on behalf of the Minister of State for Defence.
Amendments of the National Security (Contracts Adjustment) Regulations.
(
a ) by inserting in sub-regulation (1.), after the definition of “Territory”, the following definition:—“‘the Jervis Bay Territory’ means the Territory accepted by the Commonwealth in pursuance of the
Jervis Bay Territory Acceptance Act 1915 and described in the agreement set out in the Schedule to that Act;”; and
*
Notified in the
Statutory Rules 1942, No. 65, as amended by Statutory Rules 1942, Nos. 98 and 162.
3911.—Price 3d. 20/2.6.1942.
(
b ) by omitting the definition of “tribunal” and inserting in its stead the following definition:—“‘tribunal’, in relation to any application, means—
(
a ) where the matter at issue does not exceed in value Five hundred pounds and the respondent resides or carries on business—(i) in a State (other than the State of Tasmania) or in the Northern Territory or the Australian Capital Territory—a court of limited civil jurisdiction constituted by a Police, Stipendiary or Special Magistrate in the State or Territory in which the respondent resides or carries on business;
(ii) in the State of Tasmania—a Court of Requests;
(iii) in the Jervis Bay Territory—a court of limited civil jurisdiction in the State of New South Wales constituted by a Police, Stipendiary or Special Magistrate;
(iv) in the Territory of Papua—a court of limited civil jurisdiction in that Territory;
(v) in the Territory of New Guinea—a District Court in that Territory; and
(vi) in Norfolk Island—the Court of Norfolk Island sitting in its full Jurisdiction;
(
b ) where the matter at issue exceeds in value Five hundred pounds but does not exceed in value Two thousand pounds—(i) a District Court, County Court or Local Court of Full Jurisdiction in the State or Territory in which the respondent resides or carries on business;
(ii) if there is no such court or the respondent resides or carries on business in the Territory of New Guinea—except in the State of Tasmania, the Supreme Court of the State or Territory in which the respondent resides or carries on business;
(iii) if the respondent resides or carries on business in the State of Tasmania—a Court of Requests constituted by a barrister, solicitor, attorney or proctor;
(iv) if the respondent resides or carries on business in the Jervis Bay Territory—a District Court in the State of New South Wales; or
(v) if the respondent resides or carries on business in Norfolk Island—the Court of Norfolk Island sitting in its Full Jurisdiction; or
(
c ) where the matter at issue exceeds in value Two thousand pounds—(i) the Supreme Court of the State or Territory in which the respondent resides or carries on business;
(ii) if the respondent resides or carries on business in the Jervis Bay Territory—the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory; or
(iii) if the respondent resides or carries on business in Norfolk Island—the Court of Norfolk Island sitting in its Full Jurisdiction.”.
(2.) A tribunal to which an application has been made prior to the commencement of this regulation in pursuance of the National Security (Contracts Adjustment) Regulations shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine the application notwithstanding the amendments made by this regulation.
(
a ) by inserting in sub-regulation (1.), after the word “cancelling”, the words “, or suspending the operation of,”; and(
b ) by inserting in sub-regulation (2.), after the word “cancelling”, the words “, suspending the operation of”.
“
9a.—(1.)
In dealing with any application under these Regulations the tribunal shall, in
the light of circumstances attributable to the war or the operation of any
regulation made under the
amongst other things, the question of the nature of the order (if any) under these Regulations which would be necessary in order that the contract or agreement may operate equitably with respect to the applicant and the respondent, and for that purpose shall have regard, amongst other things, to—
(
a ) the question whether any trading or business activities of the applicant and the respondent, respectively, have been affected by reason of circumstances attributable to the war or the operation of any regulation made under theNational Security Act 1939, or under that Act as subsequently amended and, if so, to what extent;(
b ) where the contract or agreement the subject of the application is in respect of the provision of a service or the use of any article, the extent (if any) to which the benefit of the service or the use of the article is affected by reason of those circumstances or the operation of any such regulation;(
c ) the question whether the making of any order under these Regulations granting relief to, or conferring a right on, the applicant would be likely to result in hardship being suffered by the respondent; and(
d ) the question whether the refusal to make any such order would be likely to result in hardship being suffered by the applicant.
“(2.) In dealing with an application under these Regulations by a person engaged in farming or grazing operations with respect to a contract or agreement, being a mortgage of, or contract or agreement for the sale of, farming or grazing land, the tribunal shall have regard, amongst other things, to—
(
a ) the question whether the performance or further performance of the contract or agreement has become or is likely to become unduly onerous by reason of—(i) any difficulty in obtaining materials or equipment;
(ii) any shortage of labour;
(iii) any difficulty in the marketing of the produce of the land; or
(iv) any reduction in the price of the produce of the land;
(
b ) the question whether it is in the interests of the defence of the Commonwealth that the application should be granted; and(
c ) the question whether the applicant would be likely, if the application were granted (in whole or in part), to be able to continue to carry on his farming or grazing operations successfully.”.
By Authority: L. F. Johnston, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra.
0
0
0