National Heavy Vehicle Regulator

Case

[2016] FWC 4370

1 JULY 2016

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2016] FWC 4370
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.768BA - Application for an order about coverage for transferring employees under a state instrument

National Heavy Vehicle Regulator
(AG2016/3553)

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 1 JULY 2016

Application for an order about coverage for transferring employees under a state instrument.

[1] This is an application filed by National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (ABN 48 557 596 718) (NHVR) which seeks orders from the Fair Work Commission pursuant to Section 768BA(2)(b)(ii) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[2] The relevant facts are:

    ● In July 2016 the NHVR will take over the prosecution, intelligence and investigation functions previously undertaken by the South Australian Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI) relating to offences under the Heavy Vehicle National Law in South Australia.

    ● A transfer of business will occur between the DPTI and NHVR pursuant to s.768AD of the Act.

    ● One of the employees who will be employed by NHVR is a transferring employee.

    ● In absence of the order sought, the transferring employee would be bound by the following State instruments:

  • the South Australian Public Sector Wages Parity Enterprise Agreement Salaried 2014;


  • Determinations 1, 2, 3.1, 3.2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Commissioner for Public Sector Employment;


  • the South Australian Public Sector Salaried Employees Interim Award; and


  • the Public Service (Recreational Leave Loading) Award.


    ● The NHVR is bound by the NVHR Single Enterprise Agreement 2013-2017 (AG2013/11950).

[3] The application seeks that the NVHR will not be bound by the State instruments and that the NVHR Single Enterprise Agreement 2013-2017 will apply to the transferring employee.

[4] The application contains a statement from the transferring employee supporting the application.

[5] On 27 June 2016 the Community and Public Sector Union State Public Services Federation Group (CPSU SPSF Group) filed a statement that it was consulted extensively, has one member who is a transferring employee, does not believe that the affected employees will be disadvantaged and does not oppose the order sought.

[6] Section 768BA of the Act is set out as follows:

768BA FWC orders about coverage for transferring employees

Orders that the FWC may make

(1) The FWC may make the following orders:

    (a) an order that a copied State instrument for a transferring employee that would, or would be likely to, cover the transferring employee and the new employer because of subsection 768AN(1) does not, or will not, cover the transferring employee and the new employer;

    (b) an order that an enterprise agreement or named employer award that covers the new employer at the transferring employee’s re-employment time covers, or will cover, the transferring employee.

Who may apply for an order

(2) The FWC may make an order under subsection (1):

    (a) on its own initiative; or

    (b) on application by any of the following:

      (i) a transferring employee or an employee who is likely to be a transferring employee;
      (ii) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer;
      (iii) an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee referred to in subparagraph (i);
      (iv) if the application relates to an enterprise agreement—an employee organisation that is, or is likely to be, covered by the agreement.

Matters that the FWC must take into account

(3) In deciding whether to make an order under subsection (1), the FWC must take into account the following:

    (a) the views of:

      (i) the employees who would be affected by the order; and
      (ii) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer;

    (b) whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment;

    (c) if the order relates to a copied State employment agreement or an enterprise agreement—the nominal expiry date of the agreement;

    (d) whether the copied State instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace;

    (e) whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the copied State instrument covering the new employer;

    (f) the degree of business synergy between the copied State instrument and any workplace instrument that already covers the new employer;

    (g) the public interest.

Restriction on when order may come into operation

(4) An order under subsection (1) must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following:

    (a) the transferring employee’s re-employment time;

    (b) the day on which the order is made.”

[7] The facts are not in dispute. I have determined that it is appropriate to deal with the matter without a hearing.

[8] I am satisfied after considering the material filed with the application that:

    ● The transferring employee and his union have been consulted and they have, in an informed manner, expressed their support for orders that the Agreement, rather than the state instruments, apply to their future employment. The new employer has made this application.

    ● The transferring employee will not be disadvantaged in relation to his terms and conditions of employment.

    ● I have been advised of the nominal expiry date of the State Agreement.

    ● It would be inappropriate for the State instruments to apply to NVHR in that it would be inefficient and unproductive for NVHR to operate under such different and multiple instruments.
    ● It was not put to me that a failure to make this order would result in significant economic disadvantage to NVHR.

    ● There is some lack of business synergy between the State instruments and the Agreement. The public sector conditions and regulations are significantly different to those applying in the private and community sectors.

    ● It is in the public interest to approve the application.

[9] I have decided to grant the orders sought by the applicant. I have taken into account all of the statutory requirements under Section 768BA(3) of the Act. Consequential orders will be published contemporaneously with this decision. The order shall operate with respect to each transferring employee from the day on which the order is made or the date the transferring employee is re-employed, whichever is later.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR582310>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0