Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
NIML Ltd v MAN Financial Australia Ltd
[2006] VSCA 128
Citation 1
…mediate possession of the cheque until the cheque is discharged.” (emphasis added)[11] [9] [10] (2006) 15 VR 156 [11]…
-
Pacific Carriers Ltd v BNP Paribas
[2004] HCA 35
Citation 2
…the English Court of Appeal suggested that the burden of proof lay on the entity (a bank in that case) seeking to rely on ostensible authority. [18] (2004) 218 CLR 451 [19] [1988] 3 All ER 418 at 429 100 However, I can see nothing in those cases to suggest that a plaintiff would not generally carry the onus. Further…
-
David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
[1992] HCA 48
Citation 3
…pay regard to the substance rather than to the form of what has occurred.[26] [25] David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353; ANZ Banking Group Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1988) 164 CLR 662 at 673. [26] ANZ Banking Group Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1988) 164 CLR 662 a…
-
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation
[1988] HCA 17
Citation 4
…d.[26] [25] David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353; ANZ Banking Group Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1988) 164 CLR 662 at 673. [26] ANZ Banking Group Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1988) 164 CLR 662 at 674. 132 In this case the bond was acquired with money to which the de…
-
Briginshaw v Briginshaw
[1938] HCA 36
Citation 5
…rposes. 87 I am further satisfied that this is clearly the case on the evidence before me notwithstanding the seriousness of the allegation.[14] [14] Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 88 In these circumstances, the NAB remained the true owner of the cheque pursuant to the principles in the NIML case. Position of account…
-
Briginshaw v Briginshaw
[1938] HCA 34
Citation 6
…satisfied that this is clearly the case on the evidence before me notwithstanding the seriousness of the allegation.[14] [14] Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 88 In these circumstances, the NAB remained the true owner of the cheque pursuant to the principles in the NIML case. Position of account holders . 8…
-
NIML Ltd v Man Financial Australia Ltd
[2004] VSC 449
Citation 7
(Para 74)
…ant had received the money to the use of the plaintiff to whom in justice and equity it belongs.”[24] [24] NIML Ltd v Man Financial Australia Ltd [2004] VSC 449 at [74] 131 Underpinning recovery is the “unifying legal concept” of unjust enrichment.[25] The court will also pay regard to the substance rather than t…