National Anti-Corruption Commission (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Rules 2023 (Cth)
I, Mark Dreyfus KC, Attorney‑General, make the following rules.
Dated 19 June 2023
Mark Dreyfus KC
Attorney‑General
Contents
This instrument is the
National Anti-Corruption Commission (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Rules 2023 .
(1) Each provision of this instrument specified in column 1 of the table commences, or is taken to have commenced, in accordance with column 2 of the table. Any other statement in column 2 has effect according to its terms.
The whole of this instrument | 1 July 2023. | 1 July 2023 |
Note: This table relates only to the provisions of this instrument as originally made. It will not be amended to deal with any later amendments of this instrument.
(2) Any information in column 3 of the table is not part of this instrument. Information may be inserted in this column, or information in it may be edited, in any published version of this instrument.
This instrument is made under the
National Anti‑Corruption Commission (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2022 .
(1) In this instrument:
NACC corruption issue transition notice has the same meaning as in the Transitional Schedule.new Act has the same meaning as in the Transitional Schedule.old Act has the same meaning as in the Transitional Schedule.Transitional Schedule means Schedule 2 to theNational Anti‑Corruption Commission (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2022 .transition determination has the same meaning as in the Transitional Schedule.transition time has the same meaning as in the Transitional Schedule.(2) Expressions used in this instrument that are defined for the purposes of the new Act, and are used in relation to that Act, have the same meaning as in that Act.
(3) Expressions used in this instrument that are defined for the purposes of the old Act, and are used in relation to that Act, have the same meaning as in that Act.
(1) For the purposes of the operation of the old Act after the transition time, as provided for by this instrument:
(a) the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner may exercise the powers, and perform the functions and duties, of the Integrity Commissioner; and
(b) the Inspector may exercise the powers, and perform the functions and duties, of a special investigator; and
(c) the old Act applies with such further modifications as are necessary for matters under the old Act to be managed by the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner or the Inspector, as the case requires.
(2) For the purposes of the operation of the old Act after the transition time, as provided for by the Transitional Schedule and this instrument:
(a) an authorised officer within the meaning of the new Act may exercise the powers, and perform the functions and duties, of an authorised officer within the meaning of the old Act; and
(b) a reference in section 141 of the old Act to an identity card is taken to include a reference to an identity card issued under section 268 of the new Act.
For the purposes of the operation of the old Act after the transition time, as provided for by the Transitional Schedule and this instrument, the
Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Regulations 2017 as in force immediately before the transition time (except section 8) continue to apply as if they had not been repealed.
If the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner makes a transition determination, the Commissioner may advise any of the following of the making of the determination:
(a) the Minister;
(b) for a determination in relation to an existing investigation of a corruption issue—the person who referred the allegation, or information, that raised the corruption issue (or a representative nominated by the person);
(c) for a determination in relation to an existing investigation of a corruption issue—a person to whom the corruption issue relates.
Section 70 of the old Act continues to apply in relation to:
(a) an investigation of a corruption issue to which item 4 of the Transitional Schedule applies; and
(b) an investigation of a corruption issue by the AFP, on a referral by the Integrity Commissioner under subparagraph 26(1)(c)(iii) of the old Act, that had been commenced but had not yet been completed before the transition time.
Investigations continued after transition time (1) If an existing investigation is continued under subitem 2(2) of the Transitional Schedule, the following provisions of the old Act apply to reporting on the investigation as if the old Act had not been repealed:
(a) section 51;
(b) Subdivision B of Division 2 of Part 6.
(2) If:
(a) the Integrity Commissioner referred a corruption issue to the AFP for investigation under subparagraph 26(1)(c)(iii) of the old Act; and
(b) the investigation had been commenced but had not yet been completed before the transition time;
Division 3 of Part 7 of the old Act continues to apply in relation to the investigation.
Investigations completed before transition time—investigation by Integrity Commissioner (3) If item 38 of the Transitional Schedule applies in relation to an investigation of a corruption issue that related to a law enforcement agency, sections 51 and 55 of the old Act continue to apply in relation to the investigation.
(4) If, before the transition time, the Integrity Commissioner completed an investigation of a corruption issue that related to a law enforcement agency, sections 56 and 57 of the old Act continue to apply in relation to the investigation.
(5) If, before the transition time, the Integrity Commissioner:
(a) completed an investigation of a corruption issue; and
(b) had not yet exercised the power in section 58 or 59 of the old Act to advise a person of the outcome of the investigation;
those sections continue to apply in relation to the investigation.
Investigations completed before transition time—investigation by other agencies (6) If, before the transition time:
(a) a Commonwealth government agency completed an investigation of a corruption issue; and
(b) the head of the agency had not yet caused a report on the investigation to be prepared under subsection 66(1) of the old Act;
then:
(c) section 66 of the old Act continues to apply in relation to the investigation; and
(d) a reference in subsection 66(3) or (4) of the old Act to the Integrity Commissioner is taken to be a reference to the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner.
(7) If, before the transition time, a Commonwealth government agency completed an investigation of a corruption issue, section 67 of the old Act continues to apply in relation to the investigation.
(8) If, before the transition time:
(a) a law enforcement agency or Commonwealth government agency completed an investigation of a corruption issue; and
(b) the head of the agency had not yet exercised the power in section 68 or 69 of the old Act to advise a person of the outcome of the investigation;
those sections continue to apply in relation to the investigation.
Notices to which item 9 of Transitional Schedule applies (1) If subitem 9(3) of the Transitional Schedule applies to a notice because of a transition determination, the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must, as soon as practicable after making the transition determination:
(a) give the recipient of the notice a copy of the transition determination; and
(b) advise the recipient of the notice, in writing, of:
(i) the effect of subitem 9(3) of the Transitional Schedule; and
(ii) the person’s rights and obligations under the new Act as a consequence.
Non‑disclosure notations in notices to which item 9 of Transitional Schedule does not apply (2) If:
(a) a notation was included, under subsection 77A(2) of the old Act, in a notice served on a person under section 75 of that Act; and
(b) item 9 of the Transitional Schedule does not apply to the notice; and
(c) immediately before the transition time, the notation had not been cancelled by subsection 77A(7) of the old Act;
the old Act continues to apply in relation to the notation.
If subitem 11(3) of the Transitional Schedule applies to a summons because of a transition determination, the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must, as soon as practicable after making the transition determination:
(a) give the recipient of the summons a copy of the transition determination; and
(b) advise the recipient of the summons, in writing, of:
(i) the effect of subitem 11(3) of the Transitional Schedule; and
(ii) the person’s rights and obligations under the new Act as a consequence.
If subitem 12(3) of the Transitional Schedule applies to a direction given to a person because of a transition determination, the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must, as soon as practicable after making the transition determination:
(a) give the person a copy of the transition determination; and
(b) advise the person, in writing, of the effect of subitem 12(3) of the Transitional Schedule.
Despite the repeal of the old Act, Subdivision EAA of Division 2 of Part 9 of that Act continues to apply to:
(a) hearing material within the meaning of that Act (whether the hearing was held before or after the transition time); and
(b) derivative material within the meaning of that Act.
If:
(a) before the transition time, the authority to conduct a controlled operation was cancelled under section 15GY of the
Crimes Act 1914 by a person who was an ACLEI authorising officer (within the meaning of Part 1AB of that Act as in force at the time of the cancellation); and(b) the cancellation was to take effect at a specified later time that is after the transition time;
the cancellation takes effect at the specified time as if the cancellation order had been given by a NACC authorising officer (within the meaning of Part 1AB of the
Crimes Act 1914 as amended by Schedule 1 to theNational Anti‑Corruption Commission (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2022 ).
Six‑monthly reports (1) For the first report that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner is required to submit under section 15HM of the
Crimes Act 1914 , that section applies as if the Commissioner had also been the chief officer of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity during the period of 6 months to which the report relates.
Annual reports (2) For the first report that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner is required to submit under section 15HN of the
Crimes Act 1914 , that section applies as if the Commissioner had also been the chief officer of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity during the period of 12 months to which the report relates.
Documents and records that, immediately before the transition time, the Integrity Commissioner had caused to be kept in accordance with section 15HP of the
Crimes Act 1914 are, from the transition time, taken to be records that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must cause to be kept in accordance with that section.
(1) This section applies in relation to the general register (the
previous register ) that the Integrity Commissioner caused to be kept in accordance with section 15HQ of theCrimes Act 1914 .(2)From the transition time, the contents of the previous register are to be incorporated into the general register that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must cause to be kept under that section.
If:
(a) before the transition time, the authority to conduct an integrity testing operation was cancelled under section 15JL of the
Crimes Act by any of the following:
(i) the Integrity Commissioner;
(ii) an Assistant Integrity Commissioner;
(iii) an SES employee in the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity; and
(b) the cancellation was to take effect at a stated later time that is after the transition time;
the cancellation takes effect at the stated time as if the cancellation order had been given by the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner.
For the first report that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner is required to submit under section 15JS of the
Crimes Act 1914 , that section applies as if the Commissioner had also been the chief officer of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity during the period of 12 months to which the report relates.
If:
(a) before the transition time, the Integrity Commissioner cancelled an authority under section 15KE of the
Crimes Act 1914 ; and(b) the cancellation was to take effect on a stated day that is the day of the transition time or a later day;
the cancellation takes effect on the stated day as if the authority were cancelled by the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner.
For the first report that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner is required to submit under section 15LD of the
Crimes Act 1914 , that section applies as if the Commissioner had also been the chief officer of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity during the financial year to which the report relates.
Records that, immediately before the transition time, were kept by the Integrity Commissioner in accordance with section 15LF of the
Crimes Act 1914 are, from the transition time, taken to be records that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must keep in accordance with that section.
For the first report that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner is required to submit under section 15MU of the
Crimes Act 1914 , that section applies as if the Commissioner had also been the chief officer of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity during the financial year to which the report relates.
If, immediately before the transition time, the head of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity was the responsible custodian of a thing for the purposes of the
Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 , the head of the National Anti‑Corruption Commission is taken to be the responsible custodian of the thing from the transition time.
If:
(a) before the transition time, a thing was seized under a search warrant issued under section 225 of the
Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 , or seized under section 251 of that Act; and(b) the authorised officer responsible for executing the warrant or who seized the thing under section 251 of that Act was an authorised officer by reason of paragraph (aa) of the definition of
authorised officer in section 338 of that Act, as in force at the time the thing was seized; and(c) immediately after the transition time, the person is no longer an authorised officer;
a reference in sections 256 to 258 of that Act to the authorised officer is taken to include a reference to the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner.
If, before the transition time:
(a) a warrant was issued, or an authorisation was given, under the
Surveillance Devices Act 2004 to a law enforcement officer belonging to or seconded to the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity; and(b) the warrant or authorisation had ceased to be in force; and
(c) the Integrity Commissioner had not complied with section 49 of that Act in relation to the warrant or authorisation;
section 49 of that Act applies to the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner as if the warrant had been issued or authorisation had been given to a law enforcement officer belonging to the National Anti‑Corruption Commission.
If, before the transition time:
(a) a warrant was issued under the
Surveillance Devices Act 2004 in response to an application by a law enforcement officer of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity; and(b) the warrant had ceased to be in force; and
(c) subsection 49A(1) or (2) or section 49B of that Act (the
relevant provision ) applied to the Integrity Commissioner in relation to the warrant; and(d) the Integrity Commissioner had not complied with the relevant provision;
the relevant provision applies to the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner as if the warrant had been issued in response to an application by a law enforcement officer of the National Anti‑Corruption Commission.
For the first report that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must submit to the Minister under section 50 of the
Surveillance Devices Act 2004 , that section applies as if the Commissioner had also been the chief officer of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity during the financial year to which the report relates.
If information has not been included in a report of the Integrity Commissioner tabled in Parliament under subsection 50(4) of the
Surveillance Devices Act 2004 because of subsection 50A(3) of that Act, subsections 50A(4) and (5) of that Act apply after the transition time as if the report had been submitted, and the advice not to include the information mentioned in subsection 50A(2) of that Act had been given, by the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner.
Documents that, before the transition time, the Integrity Commissioner had caused to be kept in accordance with section 51 of the
Surveillance Devices Act 2004 are, from the transition time, taken to be documents that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must cause to be kept in accordance with that section.
Records that, before the transition time, the Integrity Commissioner had caused to be kept in accordance with section 52 of the
Surveillance Devices Act 2004 are, from the transition time, taken to be records that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must cause to be kept in accordance with that section.
(1) This section applies in relation to the register (the
previous register ) that the Integrity Commissioner caused to be kept in accordance with section 53 of theSurveillance Devices Act 2004 .(2)From the transition time, the contents of the previous register are to be incorporated into the register that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must cause to be kept under that section.
For the purposes of an appropriate authorising officer of the National Anti‑Corruption Commission issuing a written certificate under section 62 of the
Surveillance Devices Act 2004 , a person who was a law enforcement officer of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity is taken to have been a law enforcement officer of the National Anti‑Corruption Commission.
If, before the transition time:
(a) a Part 5.3 warrant, within the meaning of the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 , was issued in response to an application by the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity; and
(b) the warrant had ceased to be in force; and
(c) subsection 59B(1) or (2) of that Act (the
relevant provision ) applied to the Integrity Commissioner in relation to the warrant; and(d) the Integrity Commissioner had not complied with the relevant provision;
the relevant provision applies to the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner as if the warrant had been issued in response to an application by the National Anti‑Corruption Commission.
For the purposes of a certifying officer of the National Anti‑Corruption Commission issuing a written certificate under subsection 61(4) of the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 , a person who was an officer or staff member of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity is taken to have been an officer or staff member of the National Anti‑Corruption Commission.
(1) For the purposes of section 67 of the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 , a warrant that was issued to the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity is taken to have been issued to the National Anti‑Corruption Commission.(2) For the purposes of sections 67 and 68 of the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 , information that:(a) is lawfully intercepted information or interception warrant information that was obtained by the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity; and
(b) was transferred to the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner after the transition time under item 51 of the Transitional Schedule;
is taken to have been obtained by the National Anti‑Corruption Commission.
Documents that, immediately before the transition time, were kept in the records of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity in accordance with section 80 of the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 are, from the transition time, taken to be documents that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must cause to be kept in the records of the National Anti‑Corruption Commission in accordance with that section.
Records that, immediately before the transition time, were kept in the records of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity in accordance with subsection 81(3) of the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 are, from the transition time, taken to be records that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must cause to be kept in the records of the National Anti‑Corruption Commission in accordance with that subsection.
If, before the transition time:
(a) a telecommunications service warrant, within the meaning of the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 , was issued to the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity; and(b) the warrant had ceased to be in force; and
(c) the Integrity Commissioner had not complied with subsection 94(2) of that Act in relation to the warrant;
subsection 94(2) of that Act applies to the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner as if the warrant had been issued to the National Anti‑Corruption Commission.
If, before the transition time:
(a) a named person warrant, within the meaning of the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 , was issued to the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity; and(b) the warrant had ceased to be in force; and
(c) the Integrity Commissioner had not complied with section 94B of that Act in relation to the warrant;
section 94B of that Act applies to the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner as if the warrant had been issued to the National Anti‑Corruption Commission.
For the first report that the Minister must cause to be prepared after the transition time in accordance with Division 2 of Part 2‑8 of the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 , after the transition time, that Division applies as if the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity continued to be a Commonwealth agency.
If:
(a) information has not been included in a Ministerial report prepared under Division 2 of Part 2‑8 of the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 because of subsection 103B(3) of that Act; and(b) advice about the information was given, before the transition time, by the Integrity Commissioner under subsection 103B(2) of that Act;
subsections 103B(4) and (5) of that Act apply after the transition time as if the advice had been given by the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner.
For the first report that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner is required to give the Minister under subsection 150(2) of
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 , the report must also set out the extent to which information and records in the possession of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity were destroyed in accordance with subsection 150(1) of that Act.
Records that, immediately before the transition time, were kept in the records of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity in accordance with section 151 of the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 are, from the transition time, taken to be records that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must cause to be kept in the records of the National Anti‑Corruption Commission in accordance with that section.
For the first report that the Minister must cause to be prepared after the transition time that the Minister in accordance with Division 2 of Part 3‑6 of the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 , that Division applies as if the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity continued to be a criminal law‑enforcement agency.
Authorisations that, immediately before the transition time, were retained by the Integrity Commissioner in accordance with subsection 185(1) of the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 are, from the transition time, taken to be authorisations that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must retain in accordance with that subsection.
For the first report that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner is required to give the Minister under section 186 of the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 , that section applies as if the Commissioner had also been the head of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity during the year ending on 30 June to which the report relates.
Records that, immediately before the transition time, were kept in the records of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity in accordance with section 186A of the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 are, from the transition time, taken to be records that National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must cause to be kept in the records of the National Anti‑Corruption Commission in accordance with that section.
If, before the transition time:
(a) an international production order, within the meaning of Schedule 1 to the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 , was issued in response to application by the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity; and(b) the order had ceased to be in force; and
(c) subclause 81(1) or (2) of Schedule 1 to that Act (the
relevant provision ) applied to Integrity Commissioner in relation to the warrant; and(d) the Integrity Commissioner had not complied with the relevant provision;
the relevant provision applies to the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner as if the warrant had been issued in response to an application by the National Anti‑Corruption Commission.
For the first report that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner is required to give the Minister under clause 128 of Schedule 1 to the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 , that clause applies as if the Commissioner had also been the chief officer of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity during the financial year to which the report relates.
If:
(a) information has not been included in a Ministerial report prepared under clause 131 of Schedule 1 to the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 because of subclause 132(3) of Schedule 1 to that Act; and(b) advice about the information was given, before the transition time, by the Integrity Commissioner under subclause 132(2) of Schedule 1 to that Act;
subclauses 132(4) and (5) of Schedule 1 to that Act apply after the transition time as if the advice had been given by the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner.
Documents that, immediately before the transition time, were kept in the records of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity in accordance with clause 133 of Schedule 1 to the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 are, from the transition time, taken to be documents that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must cause to be kept in the records of the National Anti‑Corruption Commission in accordance with that clause.
Records that, immediately before the transition time, were kept in the records of the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity in accordance with clause 134 of Schedule 1 to the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 are, from the transition time, taken to be records that the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must cause to be kept in the records of the National Anti‑Corruption Commission in accordance with that clause.
For the purposes of the application of clause 140 of Schedule 1 to the
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 to records or copies mentioned in that clause that are in the possession of the National Anti‑Corruption Commission after the transition time:
(a) a reference in paragraph (1)(a) or (3)(a) of that clause to an application made by a relevant agency is taken to include a reference to an application made by the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity; and
(b) records or copies that were made available to the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity are taken to have been made available to the National Anti‑Corruption Commission.
(1) This section applies if the Inspector issues a NACC corruption issue transition notice.
(2) The Inspector must, as soon as reasonably practicable, give a copy of the NACC corruption issue transition notice to the Minister.
(3) If:
(a) the NACC corruption issue transition notice relates to an investigation or special investigation of an ACLEI corruption issue that was raised by an allegation or information referred to the Minister by a person under section 154 of the old Act; and
(b) the person elected under section 155 of the old Act to be kept informed of the action taken in relation to the ACLEI corruption issue raised by the allegation or information, and has not revoked the election;
the Inspector must, as soon as reasonably practicable, give a copy of the NACC corruption issue transition notice to the person.
(1) If the Inspector gives a copy of a NACC corruption issue transition notice to the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner in relation to an investigation of an ACLEI corruption issue, the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner must give the Inspector all information relevant to the ACLEI corruption issue that is in the Commissioner’s possession or control.
(2) If the Inspector gives a copy of a NACC corruption issue transition notice to a special investigator in relation to a special investigation of an ACLEI corruption issue, the special investigator must give the Inspector all information relevant to the ACLEI corruption issue that is in the special investigator’s possession or control.
Investigations continued after transition time (1) If an investigation of an ACLEI corruption issue is continued under subitem 36(2) of the Transitional Schedule, the following provisions of the old Act apply to reporting on the investigation:
(a) section 51 as applied by section 160;
(b) sections 162 to 165.
(2) If a special investigation of an ACLEI corruption issue is continued under subitem 36(3) of the Transitional Schedule, the following provisions of the old Act apply to reporting on the investigation:
(a) section 51 as applied by section 167;
(b) sections 169 to 173, as if the references to the Integrity Commissioner included a reference to the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner.
Investigations completed before transition time—investigation by Integrity Commissioner (3) If, before the transition time, the Integrity Commissioner:
(a) completed an investigation of an ACLEI corruption issue; and
(b) had not yet prepared a report on the investigation under subsection 162(1) of the old Act;
the following provisions of the old Act continue to apply in relation to the investigation:
(c) section 51 as applied by section 160;
(d) sections 162 and 163.
(4) If, before the transition time, the Integrity Commissioner:
(a) completed an investigation of an ACLEI corruption issue; and
(b) had not yet given the advice (if any) required by section 164 of the old Act;
that section continues to apply in relation to the investigation.
(5) If, before the transition time, the Integrity Commissioner;
(a) completed an investigation of an ACLEI corruption issue; and
(b) had not yet exercised the power in section 165 of the old Act to advise a person of the outcome of the investigation;
that section continues to apply in relation to the investigation.
Investigations completed before transition time—special investigations (6) If, before the transition time, a special investigator:
(a) completed a special investigation of an ACLEI corruption issue; and
(b) had not yet prepared a report on the investigation under subsection 169(1) of the old Act;
the following provisions of the old Act continue to apply in relation to the investigation:
(c) section 51 as applied by section 167;
(d) sections 169 to 171.
(7) If, before the transition time, a special investigator:
(a) completed a special investigation of an ACLEI corruption issue; and
(b) had not yet given the advice (if any) required by section 172 of the old Act;
that section continues to apply in relation to the investigation.
(8) If, before the transition time, a special investigator:
(a) completed a special investigation of an ACLEI corruption issue; and
(b) had not yet exercised the power in section 173 of the old Act to advise a person of the outcome of the investigation;
that section continues to apply in relation to the investigation.
(1) This section applies in relation to an ACLEI corruption issue that relates to conduct engaged in before the transition time, if:
(a) the ACLEI corruption issue is not a NACC corruption issue; and
(b) before the transition time, the Minister:
(i) was not aware of the ACLEI corruption issue; or
(ii) had not made a decision in relation to the ACLEI corruption issue under subsection 156(2) of the old Act.
(2) The following provisions of the old Act apply in relation to the ACLEI corruption issue as if the old Act had not been repealed:
(a) sections 154, 155, 157 and 158;
(b) Divisions 3 and 4 of Part 12.
(3) Section 156 of the old Act applies in relation to the ACLEI corruption issue as if:
(a) the old Act had not been repealed; and
(b) a reference to the Integrity Commissioner included a reference to the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner.
Evidence obtained in investigation or public inquiry continued after transition time (1) Part 10 of the old Act applies to evidence obtained in an existing investigation or existing inquiry continued under subitem 2(2) of the Transitional Schedule, as if the old Act had not been repealed.
Evidence obtained in investigation or public inquiry completed before transition time (2) If, before the transition time:
(a) the Integrity Commissioner obtained evidence to which Part 10 of the old Act applied; and
(b) the investigation or public inquiry in which the evidence was obtained was completed; and
(c) the Integrity Commissioner had not complied with Part 10 of the old Act in relation to the evidence;
Part 10 of the old Act continues to apply to the evidence.
For the purposes of the operation of the old Act after the transition time as provided for by the Transitional Schedule and this instrument, Part 11 of the old Act continues to apply as if the old Act had not been repealed.
For the purposes of the operation of the old Act after the transition time as provided for by the Transitional Schedule and this instrument, Division 5 of Part 13 of the old Act continues to apply as if the old Act had not been repealed.
Despite the repeal of the old Act, section 203 of that Act continues to apply in relation to a report on an investigation or public inquiry conducted under that Act.
If the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner prepares an annual report under subitem 40(2) of the Transitional Schedule, section 202 of the old Act applies in relation to the annual report as if the old Act had not been repealed.
If the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner completes a special report under subitem 42(2) of the Transitional Schedule:
(a) the Minister must cause the special report to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days of that House after its receipt by the Minister; and
(b) section 205 of the old Act applies in relation to the special report as if the old Act had not been repealed.
Despite the amendment of section 43 of the
Australian Border Force Act 2015 (theABF Act ) by Schedule 1 to theNational Anti‑Corruption Commission (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2022 , after the transition time an entrusted person (within the meaning of the ABF Act) may make a record of, or disclose, Immigration and Border Protection information (within the meaning for the ABF Act) for the purposes of the operation of the old Act (and regulations under the old Act) as provided for by the Transitional Schedule and this instrument.
Despite the amendment of the definition of
relevant Act in subsection 51(4) of theAustralian Crime Commission Act 2002 by Schedule 1 to theNational Anti‑Corruption Commission (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2022 , after the transition time that definition is taken to include a reference to the old Act and regulations under the old Act, as continued in operation by the Transitional Schedule and this instrument.
Despite the amendment of section 60A of the
Australian Federal Police Act 1979 by Schedule 1 to theNational Anti‑Corruption Commission (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2022 , after the transition time a person to whom that section applies may make a record of any prescribed information, or divulge or communicate any prescribed information to any other person, for the purposes of the operation of the old Act (and regulations under the old Act) as provided for by the Transitional Schedule and this instrument.
If an investigation of a corruption issue under Division 3 of Part V of the
Australian Federal Police Act 1979 has been commenced but is not yet completed at the transition time, the investigator for that issue (within the meaning of that Act) may continue to conduct the investigation as if the meanings of the following terms in that Act before the transition time continued to apply:
(a)
corrupt conduct ;(b)
corruption issue ;(c)
engages in corrupt conduct .
If:
(a) the investigation of a corruption issue under Division 3 of Part V of the
Australian Federal Police Act 1979 had not commenced before the transition time; and(b) the Commissioner of Police had consulted with the Integrity Commissioner before the transition time in accordance with subsection 40TO(7) of that Act (as in force before the transition time);
the Commissioner of Police is taken, after the transition time, to have consulted with the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner.
(1) This section applies in relation to a complaint made to the Ombudsman with respect to action taken by:
(a) the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity; or
(b) the Integrity Commissioner; or
(c) an Assistant Integrity Commissioner.
(2) After the transition time, the Ombudsman may deal with the complaint under the
Ombudsman Act 1976 as if the Commission, Integrity Commissioner or Assistant Integrity Commissioner continued to be a prescribed authority.(3) A reference in the
Ombudsman Act 1976 to the prescribed authority to which the complaint or the investigation of the complaint relates is taken to include a reference to the National Anti‑Corruption Commissioner.
Section 35C of the
Ombudsman Act 1976 , as in force immediately before the transition time, continues to apply in relation to a certificate given to the Ombudsman in accordance with that section.
Despite the repeal of paragraph (eaa) of Schedule 2 to the
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 , that paragraph applies in relation to decisions under the old Act in connection with a corruption investigation or public inquiry (within the meaning of that Act) as continued under the Transitional Schedule.
After the transition time, a person may apply for financial assistance, in accordance with regulations made for the purposes of subparagraph 280(2)(a)(ii) of the new Act, in respect of an application, or proposed application, to the Federal Court or the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) under the
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 for an order of review in respect of a matter arising under the old Act (as if it were a matter arising under the new Act).
Despite the repeal and substitution of paragraph 7(1)(ga) of the
Privacy Act 1988 , after the transition time a reference in that Act to an act or to a practice does not include a reference to an act done, or a practice engaged in, in relation to a record that originated with, or was received from, the Integrity Commissioner or a staff member of ACLEI (within the meaning of the old Act).
(1) For the purposes of subitem 53(3) of the Transitional Schedule, subitem 53(2) of that Schedule does not apply to the following instruments:
(a) the
Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity Enterprise Agreement 2017‑2020 ;(b) the
Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity Enterprise Agreement Determination 2020/1.
(2) The
Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity Enterprise Agreement 2017‑2020 has effect, after the transition time, as if:(a) a reference in the instrument to the Integrity Commissioner were a reference to the Chief Executive Officer of the National Anti‑Corruption Commission; and
(b) a reference in the instrument to the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity or the ACLEI were a reference to the National Anti‑Corruption Commission;
except to the extent that those references relate to the making or signing of the instrument.
(3) The
Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity Enterprise Agreement Determination 2020/1 has effect, after the transition time, as if a reference in the instrument to the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity were a reference to the National Anti‑Corruption Commission.
0
0
0