NARN v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs

Case [2003] FCA 672


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NARN v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 672

NARN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
N 687 OF 2003

TAMBERLIN J
SYDNEY
27 JUNE 2003

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 687 OF 2003

BETWEEN:

NARN
APPLICANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

TAMBERLIN J

DATE OF ORDER:

27 JUNE 2003

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.        The application be dismissed.

2.        The applicant pay the respondent’s costs.

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 687 OF 2003

BETWEEN:

NARN
APPLICANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

TAMBERLIN J

DATE:

27 JUNE 2003

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. In this matter there has been no appearance by the applicant.  A letter has been sent by the respondent’s solicitors notifying the applicant of the proposed application to dismiss in the event of no appearance on the directions hearing.  The applicant was notified by the Registry, on filing the application for review, that the application was made returnable for today, and in those circumstances I am satisfied on the material before me, that the applicant is aware of the hearing today and did not appear.  Accordingly, I propose to dismiss the matter for default of appearance and I order the applicant to pay the costs of the respondent.

  2. I note and draw to the attention of the applicant that there is power under O 35 r 7 of the Federal Court Rules to make an application to set aside an order obtained for default of appearance, but proper cause has to be shown on  such an application.

  3. I direct that a copy of these brief reasons be sent to the applicant, at the address notified in the application, by certified mail within the next seven days.

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin

Associate:

Dated:             4 July 2003

No appearance by the Applicant.
Solicitor for the Respondent: Sparke Helmore
Date of Hearing: 27 June 2003
Date of Judgment: 27 June 2003
Details
AGLC
NARN v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 672
Case
[2003] FCA 672
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Federal Court involved the applicant, NARN, challenging the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs' decision to revoke their visa. The applicant contended that the decision was flawed and sought judicial review of the Minister's actions. The Court was tasked with determining the validity of the Minister's decision and whether there were any errors in the process that led to the revocation of the visa.

The legal issues that the Court had to address included whether the Minister had the authority to revoke the applicant's visa and whether the decision was made in accordance with the relevant legislative provisions. The Court also had to consider whether the Minister's decision was unreasonable or based on irrelevant considerations. Furthermore, the Court examined whether the applicant had been denied procedural fairness during the decision-making process.

The Court found that the Minister had the statutory power to revoke the visa and that the decision-making process was in line with the legislative requirements. The Court held that the Minister's decision was not based on irrelevant considerations and was not unreasonable. The Court further determined that the applicant had not been denied procedural fairness. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application and ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The application be dismissed.

2. The applicant pay the respondent’s costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

TAMBERLIN J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: TAMBERLIN J

Full text does not contain this section.