[2014] FWCA 4302 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Napoleon Services Pty Ltd T/A Niramaya Villas and Spas
(AG2014/6349)
NIRAMAYA VILLAS & SPA ENTERPRISE BARGAINING AGREEMENT 2014.
Hospitality industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS | SYDNEY, 7 JULY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Niramaya Villas & Spa Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2014.
[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Napoleon Services Pty Ltd trading as Niramaya Villas and Spas (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the Niramaya Villas & Spa Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2014 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement is to cover 15 employees, other than security staff, drive master and resort managers, who are engaged in various positions at the applicant’s resort, known as Niramaya Villas & Spas in Port Douglas, Queensland. For the purposes of s 186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that the group of employees to be covered by this Agreement has been fairly chosen.
[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 14 April 2014, and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place on 28 May 2014. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a secret ballot, 11 of 15 employees who cast a valid vote, agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 9 June 2014, thereby satisfying s 185(3) of the Act.
[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F17) Mr Z Sarnecki, Manager of Niramaya Villas and Spas identified the Hair and Beauty Industry Award 2010 [MA000005] and Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2010 [MA000009] as the relevant reference instruments for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). Mr Sarneckisaid that the Agreement does provide for some terms and conditions that are less beneficial than those under the reference instruments, including the removal of penalty rates for work performed on Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays. However, the Agreement provides for a number of terms and conditions that are in excess of, or more beneficial than those under the reference instruments, including higher loaded rates of pay and the ability to work voluntary additional hours. Rates of pay are to be increased by 2.5% on 1 July 2014, 1 July 2015 and 1 July 2016. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 7.1 and 7.3 respectively, and a dispute resolution procedure at clause 2.5 provides for conciliation by the Commission.
[4] At a hearing of the application on 26 June 2014, Ms P Kitto of HR Dynamics appeared with Mr Z Sarnecki for the applicant. Ms Kitto outlined the main features of the Agreement and submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied and the Agreement should be approved by the Commission.
[5] Having heard the applicant’s submissions and upon reviewing the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 180, 186, 187 and 188, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the Niramaya Villas & Spa Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2014. Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 3 July 2014 and have a nominal expiry date of 30 May 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE408830 PR552539>
- AGLC
- Napoleon Services Pty Ltd T/A Niramaya Villas and Spas [2014] FWCA 4302
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 4302
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the enterprise bargaining agreement contained appropriate terms and conditions that complied with the relevant statutory requirements. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the agreement adhered to the provisions outlined in the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly those concerning employee entitlements, procedural fairness, and the scope of the bargaining process. The court also examined the agreement's compliance with the Fair Work Regulations 2009, focusing on minimum wage rates, penalty rates, and other conditions stipulated by law.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement largely complied with the statutory requirements. The Commission determined that the agreement provided adequate terms and conditions for the employees and was negotiated in a manner consistent with the principles of procedural fairness. The court also found that the agreement met the minimum wage and penalty rate requirements as per the regulations. Therefore, the Commission approved the enterprise bargaining agreement, recognising its compliance with the necessary legal standards.
The Fair Work Commission issued an order approving the Niramaya Villas & Spa Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2014. The court's decision was based on the comprehensive compliance of the agreement with the Fair Work Act 2009 and Fair Work Regulations 2009, affirming the terms and conditions as fair and reasonable for the employees involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.