Nansen and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (Migration)
Case
•
[2020] AATA 193
•17 February 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Nansen and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (Migration) [2020] AATA 193
[2020] AATA 193
17 February 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) considered an application by Nansen for review of a decision by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs not to revoke the mandatory cancellation of his visa.
The central legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it had jurisdiction to consider Nansen's application for review, given that it was lodged outside the time limit prescribed by section 500(6B) of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth). The Tribunal was required to determine if it possessed the power to extend this time limit or if the application was consequently not reviewable.
The Tribunal applied section 42A(4) of the *Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975* (Cth), which permits the Tribunal to dismiss an application without review if it is satisfied that the decision is not reviewable. As Nansen's application was filed after the nine-day period stipulated in section 500(6B) of the *Migration Act*, the Tribunal concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to review the Minister's delegate's decision. Consequently, the application was dismissed.
The central legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it had jurisdiction to consider Nansen's application for review, given that it was lodged outside the time limit prescribed by section 500(6B) of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth). The Tribunal was required to determine if it possessed the power to extend this time limit or if the application was consequently not reviewable.
The Tribunal applied section 42A(4) of the *Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975* (Cth), which permits the Tribunal to dismiss an application without review if it is satisfied that the decision is not reviewable. As Nansen's application was filed after the nine-day period stipulated in section 500(6B) of the *Migration Act*, the Tribunal concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to review the Minister's delegate's decision. Consequently, the application was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
RXQM and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (Migration) [2020] AATA 377
Cases Citing This Decision
1
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0