Nanitsos v Pantzouris

[2013] NSWSC 1079

Supreme Court

New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation:	Nanitsos v Pantzouris [2013] NSWSC 1079
Hearing dates:	9 August 2013
Decision date:	09 August 2013
Jurisdiction:	Equity Division
Before:	Lindsay J
Decision:	Proceedings summarily dismissed, with costs
Catchwords:	PROCEDURE -Summary disposal-Dismissal of proceedings -Abuse of process-Failure to comply with order for statement of claim to be filed- No reasonable cause of action identified
Cases Cited:	Nanitsos v Pantzouris [2012] NSWSC 1396 at [19]-[20]. Nanitsos v Pantzouris [2013] NSWSC 862
Category:	Principal judgment
Parties:	Dimitrios Nanitsos Andoni Pantzouris & Ors Second defendant in person
Representation:	D Nanitsos (in person) D Kratsas (1st, 3rd-12th Defendants)
File Number(s):	2012/00342791

Judgment - EX TEMPORE

1. These proceedings were commenced by a summons filed on 2 November 2012.

1. Since that time the plaintiff has made, and persisted in making, unspecified allegations of corruption said to attend the conduct of the affairs of the corporate defendant.

1. In his conduct of the proceedings the plaintiff has had the benefit of documentation provided by the corporate defendant and its current officers, in part in performance of undertakings given to the Court in November last year: Nanitsos v Pantzouris [2012] NSWSC 1396 at [19]-[20].

1. On 26 June 2013 I determined that the time had come for the plaintiff to particularise his allegations in the form of a statement of claim: Nanitsos v Pantzouris [2013] NSWSC 862.

1. The plaintiff has failed to meet two deadlines for the filing and service of a statement of claim.

1. He says, today, that he cannot file a statement of claim without further information being provided by the corporate defendant and without the provision to him of legal assistance. He accepts that, putting his case at its highest, there is no utility in the proceedings remaining on foot unless he has both.

1. His demands for information from the corporate defendant include demands for the provision of information relating to membership of the corporation.

1. Although he denies it, the plaintiff appears intent upon using the proceedings as a vehicle for political agitation within the ranks of the corporate defendant's membership.

1. I am not in a position to comment, one way or another, about the merits of debates within the membership of the corporate defendant. Nor do I suggest that there is anything wrong with the plaintiff putting the company under scrutiny. My focus is entirely on the need to ensure that any legal proceedings maintained by the plaintiff against the company, and its officers, are properly and duly conducted.

1. I remain of the view that the current proceedings require particularity about the allegations made by the plaintiff, a particularity which is nowhere on the horizon.

1. Having warned the plaintiff of the risk that the proceedings would be summarily dismissed if he did not take steps to ensure that they could be regularly conducted, and having heard him in opposition to an order for summary disposal of the proceedings, I have reached the conclusion that, as presently instituted and maintained, the proceedings constitute an abuse of the processes of the Court.

1. In those circumstances the primary order that I propose to make is that the proceedings be dismissed. In making that order, I am mindful of the apparent determination of the plaintiff, with support, it seems, from the second defendant, to proceed with some form of complaint against the corporate defendant and its officers. I am mindful, also, that that determination to proceed has been underscored by the plaintiff's provision (albeit belatedly) of $5,000 as security for costs.

1. However, in my assessment, the plaintiff has had ample opportunity to articulate his case and to obtain such legal advice as may be necessary in order to articulate a case.

1. The solicitor appearing today for all defendants other than the second defendant (hereinafter "the defendants") expressly accepts, on behalf of his clients, that summary disposal of the plaintiff's proceedings will not, of itself, preclude the plaintiff from taking further proceedings in the future should he have rights to vindicate.

1. In all the circumstances, the appropriate order is for a summary dismissal of the proceedings with costs, and I so order.

1. I note that dismissal of the proceedings carries with it termination of undertakings given to the Court, by some of the defendants, about the provision of information to the plaintiff. However, I draw to the defendants' attention that any refusal or failure on their part, in the future, to provide to the plaintiff information to which he claims an entitlement may be the subject of further complaint.

1. I confirm that, subject to further order, the defendants may continue to serve on the plaintiff documents, and notice of steps taken in the proceedings, care of the postal address, email address and mobile telephone number he has in open court provided for that purpose.

1. At this stage, I decline the defendants' application that they be granted access to the contents of the envelope (marked for identification "MFI DD2" on 2 August 2013) via which the plaintiff, in confidence, disclosed his residential address to the Court: [2013] NSWSC 862 at [25]-[26]. Should he be unresponsive to the defendants' attempts to communicate with him, they have liberty to renew their application.

**********

Decision last updated: 13 August 2013