FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| NALDI & NALDI | [2018] FCCA 2413 |
| Catchwords: PARENTING – Rule in Rice & Asplund - where final parenting orders made by consent on 5 June 2008 – hearing of preliminary issue - where the Father seeks to discharge those orders – where the Court dismissed the father’s application. |
| Legislation: Family Law Act 1975, ss.60CA, 64B, 65AA, 60CC, 65D |
| Cases cited: CDJ v VAJ [1998] HCA 67 SCVG & KLD [2014] FamCAFC 42 Searson & Searson [2017] FamCAFC 119 |
| Applicant: | MR NALDI |
| Respondent: | MS NALDI |
| File Number: | SYC 7071 of 2017 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Harper |
| Hearing date: | 4 April 2018 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 4 April 2018 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 31 August 2018 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Ms Cantrall |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Jordan Djundja Lawyers |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr Longworth |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Somerville Legal |
ORDERS
The Initiating Application filed 26 October 2017 be dismissed.
The proceedings be removed from the active pending cases list.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Naldi & Naldi is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYC 7071 of 2017
| MR NALDI |
Applicant
And
| MS NALDI |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
These proceedings concern the child, [X], born 2003 presently 15 years of age (“[X]”). The parties also share another child, [Y], born 2000, who is presently 18 years of age (“[Y]”) (collectively referred to as “the children”).
By way of Initiating Application filed 26 October 2017, the Applicant father, Mr Naldi (“the father”) seeks that final parenting orders made by consent by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia on 5 June 2008 (“2008 orders”) be discharged and that in their place, fresh parenting orders be made with respect to [X].
By way of Response, the Respondent mother, Ms Naldi (“the mother”) sought the father’s Initiating Application be dismissed.
It was common ground, between the parties, that the father’s application requires consideration of the application of the rule, as it is called, in Rice & Asplund (1997) FLC 90-275 (“Rice & Asplund”).
Background
The father was born 1975 and is presently 43 years of age.
The mother was born 1975 and is presently 42 years of age.
The parties commenced cohabitation in 1999 and married on 2001.
On 27 February 2005, the parties separated. At this time, the children were aged 5 and 1 ½ years of age respectively.
On 31…
Continue reading Naldi and Naldi
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Naldi and Naldi [2018] FCCA 2413
- Case
- [2018] FCCA 2413
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was the determination of the Initiating Application filed by the applicant. The court was required to decide whether this application should be dismissed.
Judge Harper ordered that the Initiating Application filed on 26 October 2017 be dismissed. Consequently, the proceedings were removed from the active pending cases list.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Initiating Application filed 26 October 2017 be dismissed.
2.
The proceedings be removed from the active pending cases list.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.