Nainoka (Migration) - [2023] AATA 2115

Nainoka (Migration) [2023] AATA 2115 (8 June 2023)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT:  Mrs Luisa Naomi Sukoisuva Nainoka
REPRESENTATIVE:  Ms Michele Clayton
CASE NUMBER:  1911836
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2017/3916164
MEMBER:Edward Howard
DATE:8 June 2023
PLACE OF DECISION:  Brisbane
DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 820 (Partner) visa:
·cl 820.211(2) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
·cl 820.221 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

Statement made on 08 June 2023 at 4:33pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION –Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa – Subclass 820 – the parties were validly married – parties had joint liabilities and obligations – breakdown of the relationship – visa applicant has claimed that she was subjected to family violence committed against her by the sponsor – applicant suffered family violence committed by the sponsoring partner during their relationship – independent expert provided an opinion that the applicant had suffered relevant family violence – decision under review remitted
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss, 5, 65
Migration Regulations 1994, rr 1.15, 1.23,1.24, 1.25, Schedule 2, cls 820.211, 820.221
CASES
He v MIBP [2017] FCAFC 206
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant the applicant a Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).
The applicant applied for the visa on 24 October 2017 on the basis of her relationship with her sponsor. At that time, Class UK contained only one subclass: Subclass 820 (Partner). The criteria for the grant of this visa are set out in Part 820 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations). The primary criteria must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need satisfy only the secondary criteria.
The delegate refused to grant the visa on the basis that the visa applicant did not satisfy cl 820.211.
The applicant appeared before the Tribunal on 1 June 2023 to give evidence and present arguments. The applicant was represented in relation to the review. The representative attended the Tribunal hearing.
For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.
Issues And Law
There is a two-stage process for onshore Partner visas. A visa applicant must first hold a provisional visa, enabling them to remain in Australia on a temporary basis, prior to the grant of a permanent visa. The grant of a permanent visa would generally depend on whether the relationship has continued for a period of at least two years. In this matter, the Tribunal is considering the first, temporary stage.
Where the Tribunal is considering a criterion that requires the definition of spouse or de facto partner to be met at the time of…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Continue reading Nainoka (Migration)

Details

AGLC: Nainoka (Migration) [2023] AATA 2115
Case: [2023] AATA 2115
Decision Date: 8 June 2023

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an application for a Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa, subclass 820. The applicant, who claimed to have been subjected to family violence by the sponsoring partner, sought review of a decision concerning her visa application. The Tribunal was required to consider the circumstances of the relationship between the parties, including financial, household, social, and commitment aspects, as outlined in regulation 1.15A of the Migration Regulations 1994.

The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicant met the criteria for a Subclass 820 Partner visa, particularly in light of her claim of experiencing family violence. The Tribunal was tasked with assessing all relevant circumstances of the relationship to determine eligibility.

The Tribunal found that the applicant had indeed suffered family violence committed by the sponsoring partner during their relationship, supported by an independent expert opinion. Consequently, the Tribunal remitted the application for the visa to the Minister with a direction that the applicant met the criteria specified in clauses 820.211(2) and 820.221 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Given the findings above, the appropriate course is to remit the application for the visa to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for a Subclass 820 visa.decision The Tribunal remits the applications for Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visas, with the direction that the first named visa applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 820 (Partner) visa:·Cl 820.211(2) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations·Cl 820.221 of Schedule 2 to the RegulationsEdward HowardMemberATTACHMENT - Extract from Migration Regulations 19941.15A Spouse(1)For subsection 5F (3) of the Act, this regulation sets out arrangements for the purpose of determining whether 1 or more of the conditions in paragraphs 5F (2) (a), (b), (c) and (d) of the Act exist.(2)If the Minister is considering an application for:(a)a Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa; or(b)a Partner (Provisional) (Class UF) visa; or(c)a Partner (Residence) (Class BS) visa; or(d)a Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa;the Minister must consider all of the circumstances of the relationship, including the matters set out in subregulation (3).(3)The matters for subregulation (2) are:(a)the financial aspects of the relationship, including:(i) any joint ownership of real estate or other major assets; and(ii) any joint liabilities; and(iii) the extent of any pooling of financial resources, especially in relation to major financial commitments; and(iv) whether one person in the relationship owes any legal obligation in respect of the other; and(v) the basis of any sharing of day to day household expenses; and(b)the nature of the household, including:(i) any joint responsibility for the care and support of children; and(ii) the living arrangements of the persons; and(iii) any sharing of the responsibility for housework; and(c)the social aspects of the relationship, including:(i) whether the persons represent themselves to other people as being married to each other; and(ii) the opinion of the persons’ friends and acquaintances about the nature of the relationship; and(iii) any basis on which the persons plan and undertake joint social activities; and(d)the nature of the persons’ commitment to each other, including:(i) the duration of the relationship; and(ii) the length of time during which the persons have lived together; and(iii) the degree of companionship and emotional support that the persons draw from each other; and(iv) whether the persons see the relationship as a long term one.(4)If the Minister is considering an application for a visa of a class other than a class mentioned in subregulation (2), the Minister may consider any of the circumstances mentioned in subregulation (3).

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

The Tribunal remits the applications for Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visas, with the direction that the first named visa applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 820 (Partner) visa:·Cl 820.211(2) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations·Cl 820.221 of Schedule 2 to the RegulationsEdward HowardMemberATTACHMENT - Extract from Migration Regulations 19941.15A Spouse(1)For subsection 5F (3) of the Act, this regulation sets out arrangements for the purpose of determining whether 1 or more of the conditions in paragraphs 5F (2) (a), (b), (c) and (d) of the Act exist.(2)If the Minister is considering an application for:(a)a Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa; or(b)a Partner (Provisional) (Class UF) visa; or(c)a Partner (Residence) (Class BS) visa; or(d)a Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa;the Minister must consider all of the circumstances of the relationship, including the matters set out in subregulation (3).(3)The matters for subregulation (2) are:(a)the financial aspects of the relationship, including:(i) any joint ownership of real estate or other major assets; and(ii) any joint liabilities; and(iii) the extent of any pooling of financial resources, especially in relation to major financial commitments; and(iv) whether one person in the relationship owes any legal obligation in respect of the other; and(v) the basis of any sharing of day to day household expenses; and(b)the nature of the household, including:(i) any joint responsibility for the care and support of children; and(ii) the living arrangements of the persons; and(iii) any sharing of the responsibility for housework; and(c)the social aspects of the relationship, including:(i) whether the persons represent themselves to other people as being married to each other; and(ii) the opinion of the persons’ friends and acquaintances about the nature of the relationship; and(iii) any basis on which the persons plan and undertake joint social activities; and(d)the nature of the persons’ commitment to each other, including:(i) the duration of the relationship; and(ii) the length of time during which the persons have lived together; and(iii) the degree of companionship and emotional support that the persons draw from each other; and(iv) whether the persons see the relationship as a long term one.(4)If the Minister is considering an application for a visa of a class other than a class mentioned in subregulation (2), the Minister may consider any of the circumstances mentioned in subregulation (3).