Nagpal (Migration)

[2020] AATA 833

Nagpal (Migration) [2020] AATA 833 (29 January 2020)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Gurjeet Singh Nagpal

CASE NUMBER:  1725949

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2017/323269

MEMBER:C. Packer

DATE:29 January 2020

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for an Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa:

·cl.186.233(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

Statement made on 29 January 2020 at 12:32pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) Visa – Subclass 186 – Direct Entry stream – Bricklayer –nomination approved –subject of an approved nomination –decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994, r 5.19, Schedule 2, cl 186.233

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection on 13 October 2017 to refuse to grant the applicant an Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

2. The applicant applied for the visa on 24 January 2017. At the time of application, Class EN contained one subclass: Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme). The criteria for the grant of a Subclass 186 visa are set out in Part 186 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations). The primary criteria must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need satisfy only the secondary criteria. Applicants seeking to satisfy the primary criteria must meet the ‘Common criteria’, as well as the criteria of one of three alternative visa streams: the Temporary Residence Transition stream, the Direct Entry stream, or the Labour Agreement stream.

3. In the present case, the applicant is seeking the visa in the Direct Entry stream, to work in the nominated position of Bricklayer [ANZSCO 331111]. The delegate refused to grant the visa because the applicant did not meet cl.186.233(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations because the nomination application made by Dream Estate Enterprise Pty Ltd had been refused.

4. The applicant was represented in relation to the review by his registered migration agent.

5. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

   CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

   Nomination of a position

6. Clause 186.233 as applicable in this case is set out in full in an attachment to this decision. Clause 186.233(3) requires that ‘The Minister has approved the nomination.’ On 29 January 2020 in Tribunal case 1717063 the Tribunal found the nominator, Dream Estate Enterprise Pty Ltd, meets the requirements of r.5.19 for approval of the nomination of the position in Australia. The Tribunal set aside the delegate’s decision to refuse the nomination application under review and substituted a decision approving the nomination

7. Therefore, cl.187.233(3) is met. Given these findings, the appropriate course is to remit the visa application to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for the visa.

   DECISION

8. The Tribunal remits the application for an Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa:

   ·cl.186.233(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

   C. Packer
   Member

   
   

   ATTACHMENT A

   186.233(1)     The position to which the application relates is the position:

   (a)nominated in an application for approval that seeks to meet the requirements of:

   (i)subparagraph 5.19(4)(h)(i); or

   (ii)subregulation 5.19(2) as in force before 1 July 2012; and

   (b)in relation to which the declaration mentioned in paragraph 1114B(3)(d) of Schedule 1 was made in the application for the grant of the visa.

   (2)     The person who will employ the applicant is the person who made the nomination.

   (3)     The Minister has approved the nomination.

   (4)     The nomination has not subsequently been withdrawn.

   (4A)    Either:

   (a)there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person associated with that person; or

   (b)it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person associated with that person.

   (5)     The position is still available to the applicant.

   (6)     The application for the visa is made not more than 6 months after the Minister approved the nomination.