NAFU v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[2002] FCA 1199
•20 SEPTEMBER 2002
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAFU v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1199
NAFU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
N 309 of 2002
TAMBERLIN J
SYDNEY
20 SEPTEMBER 2002
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 309 OF 2002
BETWEEN:
NAFU
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER:
20 SEPTEMBER 2002
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application is dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the respondent’s costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 309 OF 2002
BETWEEN:
NAFU
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
TAMBERLIN J
DATE:
20 SEPTEMBER 2002
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
In this matter there has been no appearance by the applicant and the material before the Court indicates that he was aware of the hearing to date. Accordingly, I have been asked by the respondent to make an order under O 32 r 2(1)(c) of the Federal Court Rules (“FCR”) dismissing the proceeding in light of the default of appearance by the applicant. I make such an order and I direct that the applicant be notified of the making of the order. I also direct that reference be made to O 35 r 7 of the FCR and a copy of that rule be sent to the applicant with the letter of notification of the orders which I make today.
Accordingly, I dismiss the application with costs.
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin. Associate:
Dated: 26 September 2002
No appearance by the Applicant. Counsel for the Respondent: M Wigney Solicitor for the Respondent: Blake Dawson Waldron Date of Hearing: 20 September 2002 Date of Judgment: 20 September 2002
0
0
0