NAFL v MIMIA
[2006] HCATrans 308
[2006] HCATrans 308
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Sydney No S565 of 2005
B e t w e e n -
NAFL
Applicant
and
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
Respondent
Application for special leave to appeal
Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders
HAYNE J
CRENNAN J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 15 JUNE 2006, AT 9.25 AM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
HAYNE J: The applicant, a citizen of Ukraine, seeks special leave to appeal against orders of a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia (Moore J). By those orders, Moore J dismissed an application for leave to appeal against orders of the Federal Magistrates Court dismissing the applicant’s application for relief under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) directed to the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal affirming the refusal of a delegate of the Minister to grant the applicant a protection visa. The applicant had made an earlier unsuccessful application to the Federal Court for similar relief in respect of the Tribunal’s decision. His appeal to the Full Court of the Federal Court against those orders had been dismissed, and an application for special leave to appeal to this Court had also been dismissed.
Because the applicant is unrepresented his application falls to be dealt with under r 41.10 of the High Court Rules 2004.
There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the conclusion reached by Moore J.
Pursuant to r 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. I publish that disposition.
AT 9.26 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
0
0
0