NAFL v MIMIA

Case

[2006] HCATrans 308

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2006] HCATrans 308

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Sydney  No S565 of 2005

B e t w e e n -

NAFL

Applicant

and

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders

HAYNE J
CRENNAN J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 15 JUNE 2006, AT 9.25 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

HAYNE J:   The applicant, a citizen of Ukraine, seeks special leave to appeal against orders of a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia (Moore J). By those orders, Moore J dismissed an application for leave to appeal against orders of the Federal Magistrates Court dismissing the applicant’s application for relief under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) directed to the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal affirming the refusal of a delegate of the Minister to grant the applicant a protection visa. The applicant had made an earlier unsuccessful application to the Federal Court for similar relief in respect of the Tribunal’s decision. His appeal to the Full Court of the Federal Court against those orders had been dismissed, and an application for special leave to appeal to this Court had also been dismissed.

Because the applicant is unrepresented his application falls to be dealt with under r 41.10 of the High Court Rules 2004.

There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the conclusion reached by Moore J.

Pursuant to r 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. I publish that disposition.

AT 9.26 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED

Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Natural Justice

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Jurisdiction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0