FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAEB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 283
NAEB V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
N 1198 OF 2002JACOBSON J
28 MARCH 2003SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N1198 OF 2002
BETWEEN:
NAEB
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
JACOBSON
DATE OF ORDER:
28 MARCH 2003
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.application for an adjournment is granted.
2.matter is stood over until 1 May 2003 at 2.15 pm for hearing.
3.costs of tonight’s application are reserved.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N1198 OF 2002
BETWEEN:
NAEB
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
JACOBSON
DATE:
28 MARCH 2003
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
On Monday 24 March 2003 this matter was listed for hearing before me. On that date an application was made for an adjournment. I granted an adjournment and gave reasons.
An application has been made to me this evening for a further adjournment. The grounds on which the adjournment are sought are firstly that the applicant wishes to have access to the transcript of the hearing before the Refugee Review Tribunal which took place on 24 September 2002. Country information is also required.
The adjournment was opposed by counsel for the respondent. Her submissions were that on the evidence before me this matter should have been ready for hearing on Monday, 31 March 2003. In my opinion there is substantial force in the submissions put by counsel for the respondent. However, the purpose which I have to achieve is to ensure that the applicant has an opportunity to present the case which has been outlined to me. Whilst I believe that he has had more than an adequate opportunity to prepare his case, I am prepared to give him one last chance and I propose to allow a period which is in excess of the period of two weeks sought by the applicant's solicitor.
I will adjourn the matter to a date to be fixed shortly which will be in late April or early May of this year.
I reserve the costs of the application.
I certify that the preceding five (5) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Jacobson.
Associate:
Dated: 1 April 2003
Counsel for the Applicant:
Mr D Brezniak
Solicitor for the Applicant:
Michaela Byers
Counsel for the Respondent:
Ms V Hartstein
Solicitor for the Respondent:
Clayton Utz
Date of Hearing:
28 March 2003
Date of Judgment:
28 March 2003
- AGLC
- NAEB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 283
- Case
- [2003] FCA 283
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues at the heart of the case revolved around the interpretation and application of provisions within the Migration Act, specifically those concerning the sponsorship of skilled migrants by educational institutions. NAEB argued that the Minister's decision was flawed, as it allegedly misinterpreted the criteria for sponsorship eligibility. The court had to assess whether the Minister's decision was legally sound and whether NAEB had grounds to challenge it.
The court considered the arguments presented by both parties and the relevant statutory provisions. In granting the adjournment, the court recognised the complexity of the issues and the need for additional time to thoroughly review the matter. The court found that the application for an adjournment was reasonable given the circumstances and the importance of the issues involved. The matter was stood over until 1 May 2003 at 2.15 pm for further hearing, allowing NAEB additional time to prepare its case. The costs associated with the application were reserved for later determination.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. application for an adjournment is granted.
2. matter is stood over until 1 May 2003 at 2.15 pm for hearing.
3. costs of tonight’s application are reserved.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: JACOBSON J
Full text does not contain this section.