Nadimpally (Migration)

[2023] AATA 4253

Nadimpally (Migration) [2023] AATA 4253 (13 December 2023)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Vijay Sai Krishnam Raju Nadimpally

REPRESENTATIVE:  Mr Kangshuo Long (MARN: 1808397)

CASE NUMBER:  2111590

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2021/1151712

MEMBER:Peter Emmerton

DATE:13 December 2023

PLACE OF DECISION:  Adelaide

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Temporary Skill Shortage (Class GK) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 482 visa:

·cl 482.212 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

Statement made on 13 December 2023 at 2:03pm

CATCHWORDS

MIGRATION – Temporary Skill Shortage (Class GK) visa – Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) – Medium-term stream – occupation of Engineering Technologist – nomination approved upon review – decision under review remitted          

LEGISLATION

Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 140
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 482.212; r 2.75

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 12 August 2021 to refuse to grant the visa applicant a Temporary Skill Shortage (Class GK) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).

2. The applicant applied for the visa on 27 May 2021. At that time, Class GK contained one subclass: Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage). The criteria for a Subclass 482 visa are set out in Part 482 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations). Applicants seeking to satisfy the primary criteria for the visa must meet the ‘Common criteria’ and the criteria of one of three alternative streams: the Short-term stream, the Medium-term stream, or the Labour Agreement stream. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need only satisfy the secondary criteria. In this case, the applicant is seeking the visa in the Medium-term stream to work in the nominated occupation of Engineering Technologist, ANZSCO 233914, Skill level 1.

3. The delegate in this case refused to grant the visa on the basis that the visa applicant did not satisfy the requirements of cl 482.212 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations because the nomination was not approved.

4. The applicant was represented in relation to the review.

5. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has decided that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

   CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

6. The issue in this case is whether the nomination is approved.

   Requirement for an approved nomination

7. Clause 482.212(1) requires that the nomination identified in the visa application is approved, was made by a person who was an approved work sponsor at the time of approval and has not ceased.

8. At the time of application, the nominator Krueger Transport Pty Ltd was an approved Standard Business Sponsor. Their sponsorship was renewed on 20 September 2023 for an additional 5 years.  

9. On 27 May 2021 the nominator, Krueger Transport Pty Ltd applied to sponsor the visa applicant for a Temporary Skill Shortage Subclass 482 Visa.

10. On 12 July 2021 the nominators application was refused.

11. Both the nominator and the visa applicant applied to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to review the decisions.

12. On 13 December 2023 the Tribunal overturned the delegates decision and approved the nomination related to this visa.

13. The Tribunal is satisfied that each of the following applies:

    (a)  the nomination identified in the application has been approved under section 140GB of the Act;

    (b)  the person who made the nomination was an approved work sponsor at the time the nomination was approved;

    (c)  the approval of the nomination has not ceased under regulation 2.75.

14. For these reasons the requirements of cl 482.212(1) are met.

15. Given these findings, the appropriate course is to remit the matter to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for the visa.

    DECISION

16. The Tribunal remits the application for a Temporary Skill Shortage (Class GK) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 482 visa:

    ·cl 482.212 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

    Peter Emmerton
    Member