MZXKM & Ors v MIAC & Anor
[2008] HCATrans 56
[2008] HCATrans 056
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Melbourne No M56 of 2007
B e t w e e n -
MZXKM
First Applicant
MZXKN
Second Applicant
MZXKO
Third Applicant
and
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
Application for special leave to appeal
Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders
HAYNE J
CRENNAN J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 7 FEBRUARY 2008, AT 9.05 AM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
__________________
HAYNE J: The applicants, a man, his partner and his daughter, citizens of Fiji with Indian ethnic origin, seek special leave to appeal against the orders of a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia (Nicholson J) dismissing the applicants' application for leave to appeal against orders of the Federal Magistrates Court (McInnis FM). By those orders, McInnis FM dismissed an application for reinstatement of an application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal. McInnis FM did not accept that a reasonable excuse for not attending an application for summary dismissal had been provided by the first or second applicants. His Honour also found that the applicants' application fell outside the statutory timeframe provided for by s 477 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) so that there was no arguable case. The Tribunal had affirmed the decision of a delegate of the Minister to refuse to grant the applicants protection visas.
There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the orders made in the courts below.
Pursuant to r 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. I publish that disposition.
AT 9.06 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Jurisdiction
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
0
0
0