MZWXD v Minister for Immigration
[2005] FMCA 1972
•9 November 2005
FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| MZWXD v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR | [2005] FMCA 1972 |
| MIGRATION – Default of appearance by party at hearing – application dismissed for non-attendance. |
| Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001, rr.13.03A(c) & 16.05(2)(a) |
| Applicant: | MZWXD |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS |
| Second Respondent: | REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL |
| File Number: | MLG80 of 2005 |
| Judgment of: | O’Dwyer FM |
| Hearing date: | 9 November 2005 |
| Delivered at: | Melbourne |
| Delivered on: | 9 November 2005 |
REPRESENTATION
| The Applicant: | No appearance |
| Counsel for the First Respondent: | Mr Mosley |
| Solicitors for the First Respondent: | Australian Government Solicitor |
| Second Respondent: | No appearance |
ORDERS
Leave is granted to join the Refugee Review Tribunal as Second Respondent.
The Application for Review filed on 21 January 2005 be dismissed pursuant to Rule 13.03A(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001.
The Applicant pay the First Respondent’s costs fixed in the sum of $6,000.00.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
MLG80 of 2005
| MZWXD |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS |
First Respondent
And
| REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
Leave granted to join the Refugee Review Tribunal as Second Respondent.
As there has been no appearance by the Applicant, pursuant to r.13.03A(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001(the Rules), the application filed on 21 January 2005 is dismissed.
In dismissing the application for non–appearance, as is my usual practice in such circumstances, I did not consider the merit of the application and did not make any findings. Should the Applicant seek to challenge my decision, r.16.05(2)(a) of the Rules provides an avenue to do so.
On the application of the First Respondent for costs, I find the application for the same in the sum of $6,000.00 both necessarily incurred and reasonable.
I certify that the preceding four (4) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of O’Dwyer FM
Associate:
Date: 9 November 2005
1
0
1