Mylan Inc. v cory dingle

WIPO Case No. D2024-5199

ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER

ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION

Mylan Inc. v. cory dingle

Case No. D2024-5199

1. The Parties

The Complainant is Mylan Inc., United States of America, represented by Viatris Inc.,

United States of America.

The Respondent is cory dingle, Canada.

2. The Domain Name and Registrar

The disputed domain name <epipenonline.com> is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).

3. Procedural History

The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on December 18, 2024. On December 18, 2024, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On December 18, 2024, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain name which differed from the named Respondent (Redacted for Privacy, Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf) and contact information in the Complaint. The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on December 20, 2024, providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting the Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. The Complainant filed an amended Complaint on December 20, 2024.

The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for

Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).

In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent of the paragraph 5, the due date for Response was January 12, 2025.

page 2

The Respondent sent email communications to the Center on December 27, 2024, and January 13, 2025.

The Center appointed Sebastian M.W. Hughes as the sole panelist in this matter on January 21, 2025.
The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and
Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the

Rules, paragraph 7.

4. Consent to Transfer

In his informal email communications, the Respondent notified the Center that he wished to resolve this
dispute, that the website at the disputed domain had been removed, and that he had requested the Registrar
to cancel his registration of the disputed domain name. In light of the Respondent’s clear indication that he
does not wish to contest this proceeding and that he does not wish to maintain his registration of the
disputed domain name, the Panel considers, in the circumstances, it is appropriate to order cancellation of
the disputed domain name solely on the basis of consent (see WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on

Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition, (“WIPO Overview 3.0”), section 4.10).

5. Decision

For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name <epipenonline.com> be cancelled.

/Sebastian M.W. Hughes/
Sebastian M.W. Hughes
Sole Panelist
Date: February 4, 2025