MyEnvironment Inc v VicForests

Case [2012] VSC 91


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA Not Restricted

AT MELBOURNE

COMMON LAW DIVISION

S CI 2011 04452

MYENVIRONMENT INC Plaintiff
v
VICFORESTS Defendant

---

JUDGE:

OSBORN JA

WHERE HELD:

Melbourne

DATE OF HEARING:

6-10, 13-16, 20-21 February 2012

DATE OF JUDGMENT:

14 March 2012

CASE MAY BE CITED AS:

MyEnvironment Inc v VicForests

MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:

[2012] VSC 91

---

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW – Proposed logging at three coupes near Toolangi – Application for permanent injunction restraining logging – Whether proposed coupes contain Leadbeater’s Possum zone 1A habitat – Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act Action Statement – Central Highlands Forest Management Plan – Construction of relevant management prescription – Hollow-bearing tree means mature or senescing tree containing hollows – No evidence that proposed coupes contain sufficient density of hollow-bearing trees to constitute zone 1A – Obligation to comply with precautionary principle – No threat of serious or irreversible damage – Proposed adaptive management measures not proportionate to threat – Application dismissed – Sections 3, 4, and 22 Forests Act 1958; ss 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, and 31 Conservation Forests and Lands Act 1987; ss 1, 4, 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 37, 38, 39, 40, 43, 44, and 45 Sustainable Forests (Timber) 2004; ss 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 17, 19, and 20 Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 - Environment East Gippsland Inc v VicForests [2010] VSC 335 - Telstra Corporation Limited v Hornsby Shire Council (2006) 67 NSWLR 256.

---

APPEARANCES:

Counsel Solicitors
For the Plaintiff Ms K L Walker with
Mr E M Nekvapil
Bleyer Lawyers Pty Ltd
For the Defendant Mr I G Waller SC with
Mr H L Redd and
Mr N Kaskani
Baker & McKenzie

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 2

History of the dispute....................................................................................................................... 7

The open offer of compromise..................................................................................................... 9

The course of the trial...................................................................................................................... 11

The statutory framework................................................................................................................ 13

Forests Act 1958........................................................................................................................... 13
Conservation, Forests and Lands Act 1987............................................................................. 14
Sustainable Forests (Timber) Act 2004..................................................................................... 15
The Code of Practice................................................................................................................... 20

The precautionary principle..................................................................................................... 24
Management procedures.......................................................................................................... 25

Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988....................................................................................... 25

The Action Statement...................................................................................................................... 28

The Forest Management Plan for the Central Highlands........................................................ 64

The Precautionary Principle.......................................................................................................... 82

Was the initial logging of Gun Barrel unlawful?.................................................................... 107

Conclusion....................................................................................................................................... 107

HIS HONOUR:

Introduction

  1. Leadbeater’s Possum (‘LBP’) is a small non-gliding arboreal marsupial.  It has grey fur with a distinctive black dorsal strip and a long club-shaped tail.  For much of the 20th century, it was known only from five specimens collected prior to 1910.  By 1960, it was believed to be extinct.  In 1961, it was rediscovered near Marysville in the central highlands of Victoria.  Subsequent exploratory surveys in the montane ash forests of Victoria[1] found the possum in patches of suitable habitat, but its distribution remains restricted. 

    [1]Forests of Mountain Ash (Eucalyptus regnans), Alpine Ash (Eucalyptus delegatensis) and Shining Gum (Eucalyptus nitens). 

  1. LBP is a colonial species and can live in groups of two…

Continue reading MyEnvironment Inc v VicForests

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
MyEnvironment Inc v VicForests [2012] VSC 91
Case
[2012] VSC 91
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

MyEnvironment Inc sought a permanent injunction to prevent VicForests from logging at three coupes near Toolangi, on the basis that the coupes contained habitat of the endangered Leadbeater’s Possum. VicForests argued that the coupes did not contain sufficient density of hollow-bearing trees to constitute zone 1A habitat for the Leadbeater’s Possum, and that its proposed logging did not threaten serious or irreversible damage to the species. The Court had to determine whether the proposed coupes contained Leadbeater’s Possum zone 1A habitat, and whether VicForests’ logging plans complied with the precautionary principle and other relevant legislation. The Court considered whether VicForests had properly identified and assessed the potential impact of the logging on the Leadbeater’s Possum, and whether its proposed adaptive management measures were proportionate to the threat. The Court found that VicForests had not provided sufficient evidence to show that the proposed coupes contained Leadbeater’s Possum zone 1A habitat. However, the Court held that VicForests had adequately assessed the potential impact of the logging on the species, and had implemented adaptive management measures that were proportionate to the threat. The Court concluded that there was no threat of serious or irreversible damage to the Leadbeater’s Possum, and that VicForests’ proposed logging plans complied with the precautionary principle and other relevant legislation. The application for a permanent injunction was dismissed.

The Court dismissed the application for a permanent injunction, holding that VicForests had not provided sufficient evidence to show that the proposed coupes contained Leadbeater’s Possum zone 1A habitat. The Court held that VicForests had adequately assessed the potential impact of the logging on the species, and had implemented adaptive management measures that were proportionate to the threat. The Court found that there was no threat of serious or irreversible damage to the Leadbeater’s Possum, and that VicForests’ proposed logging plans complied with the precautionary principle and other relevant legislation.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.