Grizonic v Suttor
[2011] NSWSC 471
Citation 1
(Para 1)
…Justice Brereton in Grizonic v Ranken Suttor & Ors [2011] NSWSC 471 at [18] opined that: … the authorities favour the view that where one partner carries on the partnership business between dissolution and winding up and, in doing so, incurs debts, those debts are to be considered “necessary to wind up the affairs…
Commissioner of State Taxation v Cyril Henschke Pty Ltd
[2010] HCA 43
Citation 2
(Para 2)
…The High Court in Commissioner of State Taxation of the State of South Australia v Cyril Henschke Pty Ltd & Ors [2010] 242 CLR 508 at [22]-[25] identified “ that the interest of each partner can be ascertained finally only upon completion of the liquidation and the identification of any surplus share .”…
Southern Cross Financial Group (Newcastle) Pty Ltd v Rodrigues
[2005] NSWSC 621
Citation 3
(Para 1)
…idence in relation to listings is consistent with Young CJ in Eq’s observations in Southern Cross Financial Group (Newcastle) Pty Ltd v Rodrigues [2005] NSWSC 621 at [40], as follows: A client list is something that courts come across in all sorts of businesses, most commonly real estate agents’ rent rolls. However…
Fry v Oddy
[1998] VSCA 26
Citation 4
(Para 3)
…In Fry & Ors v Oddy [1998] VSCA 26, Brooking JA observed at [33]-[34] that section 46 of the Partnership Act did not alter the law of equity and the early authorities indicated that each case depends on its own facts because “ [s]ometimes the skill, industry, credit and reputation of the continuing partners will…
Powell v Powell
[1996] NSWCA 431
Citation 5
(Para 1)
…Justice Long Innes in Powell v Powell (1932) 32 NSWSR 407 at 415-416 considered the authorities and noted that there are various ways of dissolving a partnership but that “ community of interest remains … until the affairs are wound up ; and that required, that what was partnership property before shall continue, for the…