| [2021] FWCA 6342 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Museums Board of Victoria
(AG2021/7662)
MUSEUMS VICTORIA STAFF ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020
State and Territory government administration | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 19 OCTOBER 2021 |
Application for approval of the Museums Victoria Staff Enterprise Agreement 2020
[1] The Museums Board of Victoria has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Museums Victoria Staff Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The employer has provided written undertakings, a copy of which is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that they will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval has been met.
[4] The Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2) and based on its declaration, I note that the Agreement covers the CPSU.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 19 October 2021 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 26 October 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 20 March 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE513577 PR735047>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Museums Board of Victoria [2021] FWCA 6342
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 6342
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the terms of the agreement and the process by which it was negotiated and agreed upon. It considered the arguments advanced by both parties and the evidence presented. The court found that the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval and that the Commission had provided adequate reasons for its decision. The court held that the Commission had correctly exercised its discretion in approving the agreement, and the appeal was dismissed. The court found that the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for both employers and employees and that it was consistent with the principles of the Fair Work Act.
The court's decision affirmed the role of the Fair Work Commission in approving enterprise agreements and the importance of providing adequate reasons for its decisions. The court emphasised the need for parties to negotiate in good faith and to reach agreements that are fair and reasonable for both parties. The decision also highlighted the importance of the statutory criteria for approval and the need for the Commission to consider all relevant factors in exercising its discretion. The court's decision provides clarity for employers and employees and ensures that the process for approving enterprise agreements is fair and transparent.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.