[2014] FWCA 4134 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Murray Goulburn Co-Operative Co. Limited
(AG2014/6169)
MURRAY GOULBURN CO-OPERATIVE CO. LIMITED DAILY PASTEURISED MILK SITES AGREEMENT 2014
Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT KOVACIC | MELBOURNE, 23 JUNE 2014 |
Application for approval of the Murray Goulburn Co-operative Co. Limited Daily Pasteurised Milk Sites Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Murray Goulburn Co-operative Co. Limited Daily Pasteurised Milk Sites Agreement 2014 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Murray Goulburn Co-Operative Co. Limited and the National Union of Workers (NUW). The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[2] Subject to concerns that have been addressed by way of undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In particular, I am satisfied that the NUW is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] As noted, pursuant to s.190(3), I have accepted undertakings from Murray Goulburn Co-Operative Co. Limited. In accordance with s.191(1) of the Act the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertakings are attached to this decision.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 30 June 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 January 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
ATTACHMENT A
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE408708 PR552286>
- AGLC
- Murray Goulburn Co-Operative Co. Limited [2014] FWCA 4134
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 4134
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the evidence presented by both parties and examined the negotiation process and the content of the agreement. The company submitted that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and that it contained all the necessary minimum terms and conditions. The union, on the other hand, argued that the negotiation process had been flawed and that the agreement did not meet the requirements of a genuine enterprise agreement. The court found that the negotiation process had been conducted in good faith and that the agreement contained all the necessary minimum terms and conditions. The court also found that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement and approved it as such.
The court's decision was based on a careful analysis of the evidence and the law. The court found that the negotiation process had been conducted in good faith and that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement. The court also found that the agreement met all the requirements of a genuine enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act. The court approved the agreement as a registered organisation agreement and it will now be binding on all parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.