Murphy v QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited

Link copied
Case Copied 23 min read
CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER 

CITATION:

Murphy v QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited [2022] NSWPIC 183

CLAIMANT: Ryan Murphy
INSURER: QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited
MEMBER: Maurice Castagnet
DATE OF DECISION: 29 April 2022
CATCHWORDS:

MOTOR ACCIDENTS - Miscellaneous claims assessment; whether the motor accident was caused mostly by the fault of the claimant; section 3.28 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017; where claimant’s vehicle struck in the rear by police vehicle at speed under flashing lights and siren en route to emergency; where claimant had commenced changing lanes at the time of the collision; whether driver of police vehicle took reasonable care; social utility of police vehicle attending emergency; whether the claimant failed to give way to emergency police vehicle; sections 5B, 5C and 5R of the Civil Liability Act2002; Road Rules 79 and 305 of NSW Road Rules 2014; finding of contributory negligence on the part of the claimant assessed at 50%; Held– claimant not mostly at fault.

DETERMINATIONS MADE:

1. For the purposes of section 3.28 the motor accident was not caused mostly by the fault of the claimant.

2.     The effective date of this decision is 25 January 2020.


Reasons for Decision

Issued under section 7.36(5) of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017

INTRODUCTION

  1. These proceedings concern a Miscellaneous Claim assessment under Schedule 2, clause (3)(e) of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (the MAI Act).

  2. The claimant, Ryan Murphy, seeks a review of the insurer’s decision made under section 3.28 of the MAI Act to the effect that the claimant was wholly or mostly at fault for the motor accident.

BACKGROUND

  1. The claimant is a 41-year-old man who suffered injuries in a motor accident on 25 July 2019 when the insured NSW Police Force vehicle collided with the rear of his vehicle on the Princes Highway, Kirrawee, near Bath Road.

  2. On 25 November 2020, the claimant made an application for payment of statutory benefits. Specifically, he sought payment of benefits for treatment and care.

  3. On 21 January 2021, the insurer notified the claimant that it declined liability for payment of those benefits after 26 weeks from the date of the accident on the basis that he was wholly or mostly at fault for the accident.

  4. On 27 January 2021, the claimant sought an internal review of the insurer’s decision. On 18 February 2021, the insurer issued a determination, affirming its original decision.

  5. On 7 May 2021, the claimant commenced these proceedings in the Personal Injury Commission (the Commission) to resolve the dispute.

  6. The proceedings are now before me for determination.

DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED

  1. In making my determination, I have considered all documents provided by the parties to the Commission, which includes:

    (a)the Application for Personal Injury Benefits dated 25 November 2020;

(b)the NSW Police Report dated 15 December 2020;

(c)the Liability Notice for Benefits after 26 weeks dated 21 January 2021;

(d)the claimant’s application for internal review dated 27 January 2021;

(e)the report of Brooksight Investigations dated 2 February 2021, which included a statement from…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Murphy v QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2022] NSWPIC 183
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In Murphy v QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited, the plaintiff, Murphy, brought a claim against QBE Insurance, the insurer for the defendant, a police officer, following a motor vehicle accident. The dispute centred on the assessment of damages under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017, particularly the issue of contributory negligence and whether the accident was caused mostly by Murphy’s fault. The case was heard in the District Court of New South Wales.

The primary legal issues for the court to decide were whether Murphy was mostly at fault for the accident, whether the police officer took reasonable care in attending an emergency, and whether Murphy failed to give way to the police vehicle, which was responding to an emergency with its lights and sirens activated. The court also needed to consider the social utility of the police vehicle’s actions and the application of sections 5B, 5C, and 5R of the Civil Liability Act 2002, along with Road Rules 79 and 305 of the NSW Road Rules 2014.

The court found that while Murphy was changing lanes when the collision occurred, the police officer did not take reasonable care in the circumstances. The social utility of the police vehicle attending an emergency was significant, but this did not absolve the police officer of the need to exercise reasonable care. The court determined that Murphy was not mostly at fault, despite finding contributory negligence on Murphy’s part, assessed at 50%. This finding led to a conclusion that Murphy was entitled to compensation for the injuries sustained in the accident.

The court ordered that Murphy’s damages be reduced by 50% in accordance with the contributory negligence finding. QBE Insurance was directed to pay the remaining 50% of the damages assessed to Murphy, along with reasonable costs of the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.