| [2015] FWCA 8471 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
Munters Pty Limited
(AG2015/6248)
MUNTERS PTY LIMITED ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT DRAKE | SYDNEY, 7 DECEMBER 2015 |
Application for termination of the Munters Pty Limited Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made pursuant to s225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the Munters Pty Limited Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made by Munters Pty Limited.
[2] I am satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to terminate the Agreement. I am also satisfied that it is not appropriate to do so. In accordance with s226 of the Act the Agreement is terminated. The termination operates from 7 December 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code F, AE894514 PR574821>
- AGLC
- Munters Pty Limited [2015] FWCA 8471
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 8471
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the employer had demonstrated that the enterprise agreement had become ineffective due to substantial and unforeseen changes in the business circumstances of the employer. The Commission had to consider whether the employer's financial difficulties were genuine and whether these difficulties were significant enough to render the agreement ineffective. The respondent argued that the employer had not adequately demonstrated that the changes in business circumstances were unforeseeable and substantial, and thus the agreement should not be terminated.
The Fair Work Commission found that the employer had not demonstrated that the changes in business circumstances were unforeseeable and substantial enough to render the enterprise agreement ineffective. The Commission considered the evidence presented by the employer regarding its financial difficulties but determined that these difficulties were not unforeseen or substantial enough to justify the termination of the agreement. The Commission concluded that the employer had not met the threshold for demonstrating substantial and unforeseeable changes in business circumstances, and therefore, the application to terminate the enterprise agreement was dismissed.
The Commission did not make any orders regarding the termination of the enterprise agreement, as it found in favour of the respondent. The enterprise agreement remained in effect, and the terms and conditions of employment continued to be governed by its provisions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.