Muljono v Council of the City of Sydney

Case •

[2015] NSWLEC 1068

•

25 March 2015

No judgment structure available for this case.

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Muljono and Ors v Council of the City of Sydney [2015] NSWLEC 1068
Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 21 January 2015
Date of orders: 25 March 2015
Decision date: 25 March 2015
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Fakes C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: change of use from a residential dwelling to a boarding house: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Maria-Goreti Suryani Muljono (First Applicant)
Trisiana Muljono (Second Applicant)
Anita Muljono (Third Applicant)
Abdul Kasim Ismail (Fourth Applicant)
The Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr K Gourile (Solicitor)(Applicant)
Mr A Hawkes (Solicitor) (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Watsin & Watsin (Applicant)
Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent)
File Number(s):10843 of 2014

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.

Judy Fakes

Commissioner

10843 of 2014 s 34 orders and conditions (85.3 KB, pdf)

Decision last updated: 26 March 2015

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

1