Mugo (Migration)
[2019] AATA 2357
•28 June 2019
Mugo (Migration) [2019] AATA 2357 (28 June 2019)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr Njeru Mugo
CASE NUMBER: 1900964
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S): BCC2018/4403670
MEMBER:James Lambie
DATE:28 June 2019
PLACE OF DECISION: Brisbane
DECISION:The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and substitutes a decision not to cancel the applicant’s Subclass 573 Higher Education Sector visa.
Statement made on 28 June 2019 at 1:31pm
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – cancellation – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 573 (Higher Education Sector) – ground for cancellation – risk to safety of Australian community or individual – assault occasioning bodily harm – charge dismissed – decision under review set asideLEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 116
CASES
Gong v MIBP [2016] FCCA 561
Tien v MIMA (1998) 89 FCR 80
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision dated 11 January 2019 made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to cancel the applicant’s Subclass 573 Higher Education Sector visa under s.116 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
The delegate cancelled the visa under s.116(1)(e)(ii) on the basis that the applicant had been charged with assault occasioning bodily harm. The issue in the present case is whether that ground for cancellation is made out, and if so, whether the visa should be cancelled.
The applicant was represented in relation to the review by his registered migration agent.
For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the decision to cancel the applicant’s visa should be set aside.
CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE
Under s.116 of the Act, the Minister may cancel a visa if he or she is satisfied that certain grounds specified in that provision are made out. Relevantly, to this case, these include the ground set out in s.116(1)(e)(ii)). If satisfied that the ground for cancellation is made out, the decision maker must proceed to consider whether the visa should be cancelled, having regard to all the relevant circumstances, which may include matters of government policy.
Does the ground for cancellation exist?
A visa may be cancelled under s.116(1)(e) if the Minister is satisfied that the presence of the visa holder in Australia is or may be, or would or might be, a risk to: the health, safety or good order of the Australian community or a segment of the Australian community; or the health or safety of an individual or individuals. There does not have to be any direct, solid or certain foundation before the power can arise. It can arise on the possibility that some event occurred in the past: Gong v MIBP [2016] FCCA 561, at [41].
The expression ‘good order of the Australian community’ is not defined in the Act. Although considering an earlier version of s.116(1)(e), the reasoning in Tien v MIMA (1998) 89 FCR 80 is still relevant. The Court held (at 94) that the term must be construed in the context in which it appears, that is juxtaposed to the words ‘the health, safety’ of the Australian community. That is, it contains a public order element and concerns activities which have an impact on public activities or which manifest themselves in a public way. It requires that there be an element of risk that the person’s presence in Australia might be disruptive to the proper administration or observance of the law or might create difficulties or public disruption in relation to the values, balance and equilibrium of Australian society.
The applicant was charged with assault occasioning bodily harm on 9 August 2018. On 21 January, in the Southport Magistrates Court, the charge was dismissed.
For these reasons, the Tribunal is not satisfied that the ground for cancellation in s.116(1)(e)(ii) exists. It follows that the power to cancel the applicant’s visa does not arise.
DECISION
The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and substitutes a decision not to cancel the applicant’s Subclass 573 Higher Education Sector visa.
James Lambie
Senior Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Jurisdiction
0
2
0