Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: MSMG Developments Pty Ltd v Hunters Hill Council [2018] NSWLEC 1498 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 19, 20 September 2018 Date of orders: 26 September 2018 Decision date: 26 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Walsh C Decision: See [4] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: MSMG Developments Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Hunters Hill Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
G Hartley, Hartley Solicitors (Applicant)
J Cole, HWL Ebsworth (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/91709 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The applicant is granted leave to rely on the plans listed under Part 1, Condition 2 in Annexure ‘A’.
The clause 4.6 request prepared by Joe Vescio dated September 2018 in relation to height of building development standard is upheld.
Appeal upheld; and
Development application number DA20171096 for the erection of a new dwelling at 14A Barons Crescent, Hunters Hill is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure ‘A’
……………………….
Peter Walsh
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (C)
- AGLC
- MSMG Developments Pty Ltd v Hunters Hill Council [2018] NSWLEC 1498
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1498
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the Council's refusal to approve the development proposal was lawful and in accordance with the relevant statutory and policy framework. Specifically, the Court needed to determine if the Council had acted in an unreasonable manner or had failed to consider relevant factors or criteria as required by the Act. The applicant argued that the Council had misapplied the relevant policy and failed to consider the benefits of the proposed development.
The Court found that the Council's decision was not unreasonable. It concluded that the Council had appropriately considered all relevant factors and policies in making its decision. The Court held that the applicant had not demonstrated that the Council had failed to consider any material factor or had acted in an unreasonable manner. The Court also found that the applicant had not demonstrated that the proposed development met all the requirements of the relevant planning scheme and policies. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the application and affirmed the Council's decision to refuse development approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [4] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.