Ms Maria Salagaras

Case [2019] FWC 8711


[2019] FWC 8711
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

Ms Maria Salagaras
(AG2019/2600)

Miscellaneous

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

ADELAIDE, 30 DECEMBER 2019

Application for termination of the iSentia Enterprise Agreement 2016 – standing – application dismissed.

[1] This is an application by Ms Maria Salagaras made under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act)for the termination of the iSentia Enterprise Agreement 2016 (Agreement).

[2] Section 225 of the Act provides who has standing to make an application to terminate an agreement after its nominal expiry date as follows:

225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal

expiry date

If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following

may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(b) an employee covered by the agreement;

(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

[3] It appears from the material provided to the Commission in support of the application Ms Salagaras is not, and was not, at the time the application was made, employed by iSentia Pty Ltd or covered by the Agreement. In the result Ms Salagaras does not have standing to bring the application.

[4] On 13 December 2019 Ms Salagaras was invited to provide submissions on the question of standing to make the application. No response was received. In the circumstances I have decided to determine the matter on the papers.

[5] On the basis of the material before me and for the reasons stated, Ms Salagaras does not have standing to apply to terminate the Agreement. It follows that the application is dismissed.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Determined on the papers

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE423157  PR715601>

Details
AGLC
Ms Maria Salagaras [2019] FWC 8711
Case
[2019] FWC 8711
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Ms Maria Salagaras, an employee of News Corp Australia, applied for the termination of the iSentia Enterprise Agreement 2016, citing changes in her employment circumstances. The Fair Work Commission was the court in this matter, tasked with evaluating the application's merits and determining the appropriate course of action regarding the enterprise agreement.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether Salagaras had standing to apply for the termination of the enterprise agreement given her specific employment changes. The Commission needed to ascertain if these changes were significant enough to warrant a departure from the collective agreement in place.

The Commission found that Salagaras did not have the necessary standing to apply for the termination of the enterprise agreement. It concluded that the changes in her employment circumstances were not substantial enough to justify altering the collective agreement. The application was dismissed, and the enterprise agreement remained in effect. This decision underscored the importance of significant changes in employment circumstances to warrant such a termination.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.