Ms Averil Devine v Westpac Banking Corporation

Case

[2021] FWC 6192

25 OCTOBER 2021

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2021] FWC 6192
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy

Ms Averil Devine
v
Westpac Banking Corporation
(U2020/11813)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT BULL

SYDNEY, 25 OCTOBER 2021

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy – Application dismissed - Confidentiality and non-publication orders restricting publication of Commission reasons for decision.

[1] On 12 August 2020, Ms Averil Devine was dismissed from her employment with Westpac Banking Corporation (Westpac/the respondent). The reasons for the dismissal were not made known to Ms Devine at the time of her dismissal. Westpac advised Ms Devine that it was prevented for legal reasons from disclosing its reasons for terminating her employment.

[2] Ms Devine subsequently made an application pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) alleging she was unfairly dismissed.

[3] On 19 March 2021, Westpac made an application for confidentiality orders which were in effect non-publication orders to any third parties of any reasons for the decision that disclosed ‘Protected Information’. The meaning of Protected Information was defined as the information concerning the legal and/or factual basis for the termination of Ms Devine’s employment, the identity of the regulator and the relevant legislation governing the regulator; and any documents containing information provided to or received from the regulator by the respondent.

[4] The Fair Work Commission (the Commission) was satisfied that the confidentiality orders as sought by Westpac should issue and pursuant to s.594 of the Act made the confidentiality orders as sought on 2 April 2021.1

[5] As stated above, the confidentiality orders included that the Commission will not publish in its decision any Protected Information.

[6] For the reasons given separately to the parties, Ms Devine’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy is dismissed.

[7] The reasons for the Commission’s decision to dismiss Ms Devine’s application will remain confidential to the parties.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Appearances:

Ms L Saunders of Counsel and Mr S Howe solicitor on behalf of the applicant
Ms K Nomchong SC
and Ms V Siow solicitor on behalf of the respondent

Hearing details:

Microsoft Teams Hearing

2021
9 and 16 September

Final written submissions:

2021

22 September – Westpac

29 September – Ms Devine

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR735186>

1 [2021] FWC 1654

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

0