[2011] FWA 3997 |
|
INTERIM DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy
Mrs Karen Debra Stocker
v
A.B.C. Developmental Learning Centre Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (Receivers and Managers Appointed)T/A A.B.C. Learning Centre
(U2010/9165)
COMMISSIONER CLOGHAN | PERTH, 24 JUNE 2011 |
Unfair dismissal.
[1] On 16 May 2011, I issued an Interim Decision [2011] FWA 2326 (PR508475) concerning an application by Ms Karen Stocker (“the Applicant”) alleging that she had been unfairly dismissed from her employment with A.B.C. Developmental Learning Centre Pty Ltd trading as A.B.C. Learning Centre (“the Employer”).
[2] The relevant parts of the 16 May 2011 Interim Decision are contained in paragraphs [57] and [58] as follows:
“[57] For the above reasons, I find that, in accordance with s.500(2) of the Corporations Act, Ms Stocker is required to seek leave of the Court as defined in s.58AA of the Corporations Act before the Tribunal can continue with these proceedings.
“[58] In conclusion, the Tribunal will adjourn these proceedings until 22 June 2011 to enable Ms Stocker to seek leave of the Court. Should Ms Stocker not receive or establish that she is pursuing leave of the Court by 22 June 2011, the application will be dismissed.”
[3] On 21 June 2011, Ms Stocker’s representative sought that the deadline in paragraph [58] be extended to 30 September 2011. The representative set out what active steps Ms Stocker and her representative have taken to obtain the leave of the Court as defined in s.58AA of the Corporations Act 2001.
[4] On 22 June 2011, I forwarded the Applicant’s request to the Employer’s representative who provided a response on 23 June 2011.
[5] While acknowledging the difficulties of the Applicant to gain legal representation to obtain the leave of the Court, I am also mindful of the Employer’s contention that “the matter cannot be allowed to continue indefinitely”. This comment is particularly relevant in view of the corporate status of the Employer and that the alleged unfair dismissal took place on 18 May 2010.
[6] Having received entreaties from both parties, I have determined that the deadline will be extended to 4:00pm on 29 July 2011 which is approximately twice the length of time provided initially. However, should I not receive the leave of the Court by 4:00pm on 29 July 2011, I will dismiss the application without further consideration. In case there is any misunderstanding or expectation on the Applicant’s part, the 29 July 2011 deadline means that Ms Stocker must produce the leave of the Court and not that she is pursing leave of the Court.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR510844>
- AGLC
- Mrs Karen Debra StockervA.B.C. Developmental Learning Centre Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (Receivers and Managers Appointed)T/A A.B.C. Learning Centre [2011] FWA 3997
- Case
- [2011] FWA 3997
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue the court needed to resolve was whether Mrs. Stocker was required to seek leave of the Court under section 58AA of the Corporations Act 2001 before the Tribunal could proceed with her unfair dismissal application. The court had to balance Mrs. Stocker’s difficulties in obtaining legal representation against the employer’s contention that the matter should not be allowed to continue indefinitely due to the company’s corporate status and the timing of the alleged dismissal.
The Commissioner, acknowledging the challenges faced by Mrs. Stocker in obtaining legal representation, extended the deadline for her to produce the leave of the Court. The new deadline was set for 29 July 2011, giving Mrs. Stocker approximately twice the initial time to secure the necessary leave. The Commissioner made it clear that failure to produce the leave of the Court by this extended deadline would result in the dismissal of the application without further consideration. This decision aimed to ensure that the proceedings did not continue indefinitely while also allowing Mrs. Stocker additional time to pursue the required legal leave.
The final order of the court was that the application would be dismissed if Mrs. Stocker did not produce the leave of the Court by 4:00pm on 29 July 2011. The court emphasized that this deadline meant Mrs. Stocker must produce the leave of the Court, not merely that she was pursuing it.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.