Mrs Aidan Burgess; Qantas Airways Limited

Case

[2019] FWC 6116

2 SEPTEMBER 2019

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2019] FWC 6116
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees

Mrs Aidan Burgess; Qantas Airways Limited
(AG2019/2759)

Airline operations

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CROSS

SYDNEY, 2 SEPTEMBER 2019

Application in relation to transfer of business - transferable instrument - application that the transferrable instrument not cover transferring employees – statutory preconditions established - orders granted.

[1] This is an application, pursuant to s.318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the “Act”) filed by Ms Aidan Burgess and Qantas Airways Limited (collectively referred to as the “Applicants”), which seeks orders from the Fair Work Commission (the “Commission”) that a transferrable instrument, being the Jetstar/ASU Agreement 2018 (the “Agreement”) will not apply to the Applicants if Ms Burgess transfers from Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd (“Jetstar”) to Qantas Airways Limited (“Qantas”). Both companies are associated entities for the purposes of s.311(6) of the Act, within the meaning of s.50AAA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

[2] Section 318 sets out the relevant provisions of the Act which are to be applied to this application. They are expressed as follows:

“318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees

Orders that the FWC may make

(1) The FWC may make the following orders:

(a)  an order that a transferable instrument that would, or would be likely to, cover the new employer and a transferring employee because of paragraph 313(1)(a) does not, or will not, cover the new employer and the transferring employee;

(b)  an order that an enterprise agreement or a named employer award

That covers the new employer covers, or will cover, the transferring employee.

Who may apply for an order

(2) The FWC may make the order only on application by any of the following:

(a) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new

employer;

(b) a transferring employee, or an employee who is likely to be a transferring employee;

(c) if the application relates to an enterprise agreement—an employee

organisation that is, or is likely to be, covered by the agreement;

(d) if the application relates to a named employer award—an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee referred to in paragraph (b).

Matters that the FWC must take into account

(3) In deciding whether to make the order, the FWC must take into account

the following:

(a) the views of:

(i) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; and

(ii) the employees who would be affected by the order;

(b) whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment;

(b) if the order relates to an enterprise agreement—the nominal expiry date of the agreement;

(d)  whether the transferable instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace;

(e)  whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the transferable instrument covering the new employer;

(f)  the degree of business synergy between the transferable instrument and any workplace instrument that already covers the new employer;

(g)  the public interest.

Restriction on when order may come into operation

(4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular

transferring employee before the later of the following:

(a) the time when the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer;

(b)  the day on which the order is made.”

[3] In the Applicants’ Form F40 – Application for Orders in Relation to a Transfer of Business – Ms Burgess and Mr Simon Brown (Head of Industrial Relations, Domestic) explained the background to the application.

[4] In brief, Ms Burgess has been employed by Jetstar on a part-time basis since 17 September, 2018, as a Customer Service Officer. Ms Burgess has also been offered an ongoing position as a Customer Service Agent at Qantas, subject to the approval of this application by the Commission and Ms Burgess resigning from her employment with Jetstar. The work she will perform as a Customer Service Agent with Qantas will be the same, or substantially the same, as the work she performed at Jetstar. Ms Burgess has filed a statutory declaration supporting the application.

[5] Having reviewed the filed documentation and considered the submissions of the Applicants, I am satisfied that all the requirements of s.318 of the Act have been met. Specifically, I have taken into account all of the matters in s.318(3) in arriving at my decision and note, in particular, Ms Burgess’ personal and professional reasons for seeking employment with Qantas. Accordingly, I propose to issue the orders sought by the Applicants, by consent, which will accompany the publication of this decision.

[6] Pursuant to s.318(4) of the Act, the orders shall take effect from today.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE500159  PR711947 >

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0