Mr Ronald James Emil Petersen v Parterri Investments Pty Ltd T/A Adelaide Refridgerated

[2017] FWC 4943

[2017] FWC 4943

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy

Mr Ronald James Emil Petersen
v
Parterri Investments Pty Ltd T/A Adelaide Refridgerated
(U2017/9271)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT ANDERSON ADELAIDE, 22 SEPTEMBER 2017

Application for relief from unfair dismissal – minimum employment period not met – non responsive applicant - application dismissed

[1] On 28 August 2017, Mr Ronald James Emil Petersen made an application for a remedy for unfair dismissal under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the FW Act).

[2] Mr Petersen claimed that he commenced employment with Parterri Investments Pty Ltd T/A Adelaide Refridgerated on 9 April 2017 and that he was notified of his dismissal on 7 August 2017.

[3] On 28 August 2017, correspondence was sent by the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) to Mr Petersen pointing out that, on the basis of the information contained in his application, he had not served the legally required minimum employment period. The correspondence required Mr Petersen to advise the Commission within 14 days whether he wished to proceed with his application.

[4] On 12 September 2017, further correspondence was sent to Mr Petersen allowing a further 7 days in which to reply, after which time the application will be determined and may be dismissed.

[5] To date, Mr Petersen has not replied to that correspondence.

[6] Section 382 of the Act provides that a person is protected from unfair dismissal if they have completed a period of employment of at least the minimum employment period.

[7] Section 383 of the FW Act sets out the legally required minimum employment period for applications of this type:

383 Meaning of minimum employment period

The minimum employment period is:

(a) if the employer is not a small business employer—6 months ending at the earlier of the following times:

(i) the time when the person is given notice of the dismissal;

(ii) immediately before the dismissal; or

(b) if the employer is a small business employer—one year ending at that time.

[8] Unless the minimum employment period has been served, the Commission has no jurisdiction to further hear and determine the application. In the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied Mr Petersen has not completed the required minimum employment period. His application has no reasonable prospects of success.

[9] Section 587(1) of the Act provides:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

[10] Accordingly, the application is dismissed under section 587(1)(c) of the FW Act. An Order to this effect will be issued shortly.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR596286>