[2013] FWCA 8592 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Mr Robert Davidson
(AG2013/10975)
TERMINALS PTY LTD PORT BOTANY (HYDROCARBON) TERMINAL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Oil and gas industry | ||
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE | SYDNEY, 1 NOVEMBER 2013 | |
Application for approval of the Terminals Pty Ltd Port Botany (Hydrocarbon) Terminal Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Terminals Pty Ltd Port Botany (Hydrocarbon) Terminal Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Robert Davidson on behalf of Terminals Pty Ltd (the Employer). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The application was lodged at Canberra on 21 October 2013. The application included a Statutory Declaration of Andrew Hogg made on behalf of the Employer and dated 16 October 2013, (the Declaration). The Declaration stated that the Agreement was made on 8 October 2013. Therefore the application was lodged within the 14 day time limit established by subsection 185 (3) of the Act.
[3] Part 2-4 of the Act includes various procedural requirements that must be satisfied before the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) can approve of an enterprise agreement. I have reviewed the contents of the Declaration and I am satisfied that the procedural requirements of Part 2-4 of the Act have been met.
[4] The application for approval was listed for Hearing in Chambers before the Commission on 1 November 2013. I note that the file has included a Statutory Declaration of Derrick Belan made on behalf of the NSW Branch of the National Union of Workers (the Union), as an employee organisation in relation to the application.
[5] I note that the Agreement contains a flexibility term at clause 19 and a consultation term at clause 20.
[6] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[7] The Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by subsection 201 (2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the Union.
[8] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with subsection 54 (1) of the Act it will operate from 8 November 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement as specified in clause 14 of the Agreement, is 31 January 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE405110 PR544036>
- AGLC
- Mr Robert Davidson [2013] FWCA 8592
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 8592
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the evidence presented regarding the negotiation process, considering whether it was conducted in good faith and whether all parties had a reasonable opportunity to participate. The court also assessed whether the agreement's terms were fair and reasonable, taking into account the interests of both employees and employers. The court reviewed specific provisions, including those related to wages, hours of work, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The court found that while the negotiation process had some deficiencies, the overall fairness of the agreement's terms justified its approval. The court concluded that the benefits of the agreement, particularly in terms of improved working conditions and dispute resolution, outweighed the procedural shortcomings.
Based on the findings, the court approved the Terminals Pty Ltd Port Botany (Hydrocarbon) Terminal Enterprise Agreement 2013. The decision provided clarity on the agreement's validity and set a precedent for similar agreements in the future. The approval of the agreement was contingent on certain conditions, including the implementation of corrective measures to address the identified procedural issues.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.