Mr Paul Dale v Marky Industries Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2019] FWC 8446
•13 DECEMBER 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Mr Paul Dale v Marky Industries Pty Ltd [2019] FWC 8446
[2019] FWC 8446
13 DECEMBER 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Mr Paul Dale brought an application against Marky Industries Pty Ltd in the Fair Work Commission, contending that his dismissal was unfair. The primary dispute centred around whether the dismissal was a genuine redundancy or if it was unfair under the Fair Work Act. The Commission had to determine whether the employer had followed the correct procedures for redundancy and if the dismissal was genuinely based on redundancy.
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the dismissal was genuinely due to redundancy and whether the employer had adequately considered redeployment. The Commission had to assess if the employer had acted reasonably in not redeploying Mr Dale to a different role within the company. Additionally, the Commission needed to decide if the dismissal was fair under the Act, considering the employer's conduct and the applicable provisions of the modern award.
The Commission found that the modern award did not apply to the dismissal, as the employer had not followed the necessary procedures. It was determined that the employer dealt with the redeployment of Mr Dale unreasonably. The Commission was not satisfied that it would not have been reasonable in the circumstances to redeploy the applicant to another position within the business. Consequently, the dismissal was not a case of genuine redundancy. The Commission concluded that the dismissal was unfair, and while reinstatement was not deemed appropriate, it awarded Mr Dale compensation for the unfair dismissal.
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the dismissal was genuinely due to redundancy and whether the employer had adequately considered redeployment. The Commission had to assess if the employer had acted reasonably in not redeploying Mr Dale to a different role within the company. Additionally, the Commission needed to decide if the dismissal was fair under the Act, considering the employer's conduct and the applicable provisions of the modern award.
The Commission found that the modern award did not apply to the dismissal, as the employer had not followed the necessary procedures. It was determined that the employer dealt with the redeployment of Mr Dale unreasonably. The Commission was not satisfied that it would not have been reasonable in the circumstances to redeploy the applicant to another position within the business. Consequently, the dismissal was not a case of genuine redundancy. The Commission concluded that the dismissal was unfair, and while reinstatement was not deemed appropriate, it awarded Mr Dale compensation for the unfair dismissal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Unfair Dismissal
-
Genuine Redundancy
-
Compensatory Damages
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Susan Jankovic v Logan Child Friendly Community Limited [2022] FWC 1108
Cases Citing This Decision
10
Susan Jankovic v Logan Child Friendly Community Limited
[2022] FWC 1108
Amit Shur v Innovit Australia Pty Ltd
[2021] FWC 830
Karen Anderson v Spirit WA Pty Ltd T/A Professionals Rockingham
[2020] FWC 4199
Cases Cited
11
Statutory Material Cited
0
Technical and Further Education Commission T/A TAFE NSW v Pykett
[2014] FWCFB 714
Johnston v Blue Circle Southern Cement Pty Ltd
[2010] FWA 5149
Iryna Margolina v Jenny Craig Weight Loss Centres Pty. Ltd
[2011] FWA 5215